Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of a Modified Biopsy Needle for Irreversible Electroporation Ablation and Periprocedural Tissue Sampling.
Wimmer, Thomas; Srimathveeravalli, Govindarajan; Silk, Mikhail; Monette, Sebastien; Gutta, Narendra; Maybody, Majid; Erinjery, Joseph P; Coleman, Jonathan A; Solomon, Stephen B; Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
Affiliation
  • Wimmer T; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA thomas.wimmer@medunigraz.at.
  • Srimathveeravalli G; Division of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Silk M; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Monette S; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Gutta N; Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Maybody M; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Erinjery JP; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Coleman JA; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Solomon SB; Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Sofocleous CT; Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Technol Cancer Res Treat ; 15(6): 749-758, 2016 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26443800
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To test the feasibility of modified biopsy needles as probes for irreversible electroporation ablation and periprocedural biopsy.

METHODS:

Core biopsy needles of 16-G/9-cm were customized to serve as experimental ablation probes. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation was performed in in vivo porcine kidneys with pairs of experimental (n = 10) or standard probes (n = 10) using a single parameter set (1667 V/cm, ninety 100 µs pulses). Two biopsy samples were taken immediately following ablation using the experimental probes (n = 20). Ablation outcomes were compared using computed tomography, simulation, and histology. Biopsy and necropsy histology were compared.

RESULTS:

Simulation-suggested ablations with experimental probes were smaller than that with standard electrodes (455.23 vs 543.16 mm2), although both exhibited similar shape. Computed tomography (standard 556 ± 61 mm2, experimental 515 ± 67 mm2; P = .25) and histology (standard 313 ± 77 mm2, experimental 275 ± 75 mm2; P = .29) indicated ablations with experimental probes were not significantly different from the standard. Histopathology indicated similar morphological changes in both groups. Biopsies from the ablation zone yielded at least 1 core with sufficient tissue for analysis (11 of the 20).

CONCLUSIONS:

A combined probe for irreversible electroporation ablation and periprocedural tissue sampling from the ablation zone is feasible. Ablation outcomes are comparable to those of standard electrodes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biopsy, Needle / Electroporation / Ablation Techniques Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biopsy, Needle / Electroporation / Ablation Techniques Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos