Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Translating New Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines into Practice: The Experience of One Community Hospital.
Ledford, Christy J W; Gawrys, Breanna L; Wall, Jessica L; Saas, Patrick D; Seehusen, Dean A.
Affiliation
  • Ledford CJ; From the Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (CJWL); the National Capital Consortium Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA (BLG, JLW, PDS); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine
  • Gawrys BL; From the Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (CJWL); the National Capital Consortium Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA (BLG, JLW, PDS); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine
  • Wall JL; From the Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (CJWL); the National Capital Consortium Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA (BLG, JLW, PDS); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine
  • Saas PD; From the Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (CJWL); the National Capital Consortium Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA (BLG, JLW, PDS); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine
  • Seehusen DA; From the Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD (CJWL); the National Capital Consortium Family Medicine Residency Program, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Fort Belvoir, VA (BLG, JLW, PDS); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine
J Am Board Fam Med ; 29(1): 152-5, 2016.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26769888
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In December 2013 the US Preventive Services Task Force issued a recommendation for lung cancer screening with annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). As screening guidelines emerge and change, this creates an environment for studying the translation of these guidelines into practice. This study assessed how these guidelines were implemented in a community hospital setting and the resulting radiologic findings.

METHODS:

This observational study examined the radiologic outcomes of LDCT lung cancer screening guidelines and the resulting notification.

RESULTS:

During the first year after publication of the guidelines, 94 screening LDCT scans were ordered. Of these, 21 (22.3%) did not meet the criteria outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Among the 72 cases that did met published criteria, 65.3% of scans detected nodules, and among the remaining 35.6%, half had another clinically significant finding.

DISCUSSION:

This study shows that new lung cancer screening guidelines, as implemented at a community hospital, resulted in radiologic findings that required follow-up in more than half of patients. Clinicians must be aware of these potential incidental findings when talking to patients about the decision to order screenings.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Early Detection of Cancer / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mass Screening / Early Detection of Cancer / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Year: 2016 Document type: Article