Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy: Are Biomarkers and Clinical Predictive Models Useful?
Parilla, Barbara V; Fournogerakis, Rachel; Archer, Amy; Sulo, Suela; Laurent, Lisa; Lee, Patricia; Chhotani, Benazir; Hesse, Kathleen; Kulstad, Erik.
Affiliation
  • Parilla BV; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.
  • Fournogerakis R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.
  • Archer A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.
  • Sulo S; James R. & Helen D. Russell Institute for Research & Innovation, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.
  • Laurent L; Department of Radiology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.
  • Lee P; Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Chhotani B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Hesse K; Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois.
  • Kulstad E; Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, Illinois.
AJP Rep ; 6(2): e160-4, 2016 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27119048
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether trimester-specific D-dimer levels or the modified Wells score (MWS) is a useful risk stratification tool to exclude pregnant women at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) from diagnostic imaging. Study Design This is a prospective and retrospective cohort study. Pregnant women who underwent diagnostic imaging for suspected PE were prospectively enrolled. D-dimer serum levels were drawn, and a MWS was assigned. Pregnant women diagnosed with a PE before study launch who underwent diagnostic imaging and had a D-dimer level drawn were also evaluated. Results In this study, 17 patients were diagnosed with a PE and 42 patients had no PE on diagnostic imaging. Sixteen out of 17 patients with a PE versus 11 out of 42 without PE had an abnormal D-dimer level (p = 0.001). Four patients with a PE versus zero without a PE had an abnormal MWS (p = 0.005). The combination of a trimester-specific D-dimer level along with the MWS was abnormal in all 17 patients with a documented PE versus 11/42 (26.2%) patients without a documented PE (p = 0.001). Conclusion A combination of trimester-specific D-dimer levels along with a MWS can be used in pregnancy to triage women into a low-risk category for PE and thereby avoid radiation exposure in a majority of pregnant patients.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: AJP Rep Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: AJP Rep Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos