Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vitro evaluation of marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in metal ceramic restorations produced with new technologies.
Kocaagaoglu, Hasan; Kilinç, Halil Ibrahim; Albayrak, Haydar; Kara, Meryem.
Affiliation
  • Kocaagaoglu H; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. Electronic address: hasankocaagaoglu@hotmail.com.
  • Kilinç HI; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
  • Albayrak H; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
  • Kara M; Specialist Dentist, Kibris Sehitler Oral and Dental Health Center, Denizli, Turkey.
J Prosthet Dent ; 116(3): 368-74, 2016 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27130177
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

Marginal and axial discrepancies of metal ceramic restorations are key to their long-term success. Little information is available for metal ceramic restorations fabricated with soft metal milling and laser sintering technologies.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies in single-unit metal ceramic restorations fabricated with new production techniques with those in a single-unit restoration fabricated using a conventional technique. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

After the artificial tooth was prepared, impressions were made, and 40 dies were obtained. Dies were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10). Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) cast (C), hard metal milled (HM), laser sintered (LS), and soft metal milled (SM) copings were fabricated. Marginal, axial, and occlusal discrepancies of these copings were measured using the silicone replica technique before and after the application of veneering ceramic. Data were analyzed with repeated measurements 2-way ANOVAs and Bonferroni post hoc tests (α=.05).

RESULTS:

Significant differences were found in the increase of marginal discrepancy after the application of veneering ceramic in the LS group (P=.016). However, no significant differences in marginal discrepancy were found whether veneering ceramic was applied to copings before or after in the other groups (P>.05). With regard to marginal and occlusal discrepancies, significant differences were found among the production techniques (P<.001 and P<.05, respectively). No significant differences in axial discrepancies were found among the groups (P>.05).

CONCLUSION:

This in vitro study showed that metal ceramic restorations produced with HM and newly introduced SM techniques exhibited better marginal adaptations than those produced with the LS or C technique.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metal Ceramic Alloys / Dental Prosthesis Design / Dental Restoration, Permanent Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Prosthet Dent Year: 2016 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metal Ceramic Alloys / Dental Prosthesis Design / Dental Restoration, Permanent Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Prosthet Dent Year: 2016 Document type: Article