Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prescribing Preferences in the First-Line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States.
Hackshaw, Michelle D; Holmes, Michael; Lankford, Maria; Thomas, Michele; Ogbonnaya, Augustina; Eaddy, Michael.
Affiliation
  • Hackshaw MD; GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Holmes M; GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Lankford M; Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL. Electronic address: maria.lankford@xcenda.com.
  • Thomas M; Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL.
  • Ogbonnaya A; Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL.
  • Eaddy M; Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 14(5): e479-e487, 2016 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27221141
BACKGROUND: Despite existing guidelines for first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), prescribing preferences in the United States have not been fully examined. The objectives of this study were to characterize US physicians' preferences and factors influencing first-line mRCC treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Web-based study presented physicians with hypothetical mRCC patient cases and recorded initial therapy preference and rationale. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize preferred treatment; logistic regression was used to determine patient characteristics associated with therapy changes. Analyses were conducted on pooled responses across cases. Model results were summarized using odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals, and P values for the covariates. RESULTS: One hundred nine physicians participated in the study; 96 (88.1%) chose a tyrosine kinase inhibitor as their preferred first-line mRCC treatment (62 [56.9%], sunitinib; 31 [28.4%], pazopanib). Perceived superior overall survival and progression-free survival were top reasons physicians chose sunitinib; enhanced tolerability and efficacy similar to sunitinib were top reasons physicians chose pazopanib. Initial sunitinib prescribers were more likely to change therapy in the presence of comorbid conditions (OR, 2.915; P = .0068), poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (OR, 2.368; P = .0106), or poor prognostic risk (OR, 3.884; P = .0224). This was not seen for initial pazopanib prescribers. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib and pazopanib were the most preferred agents for first-line mRCC treatment. Sunitinib preference was driven by perceptions of efficacy, and pazopanib was preferred for its perceived tolerability and efficacy similar to sunitinib. With varying clinical scenarios, initial pazopanib prescribers were more likely to maintain pazopanib and alter dosing; sunitinib prescribers were more likely to switch therapy.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Drug Prescriptions / Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Protein Kinase Inhibitors / Kidney Neoplasms Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Drug Prescriptions / Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Protein Kinase Inhibitors / Kidney Neoplasms Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Year: 2016 Document type: Article Country of publication: Estados Unidos