Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia.
Sha, Jennifer; Bakaraju, Ravi C; Tilia, Daniel; Chung, Jiyoon; Delaney, Shona; Munro, Anna; Ehrmann, Klaus; Thomas, Varghese; Holden, Brien A.
Affiliation
  • Sha J; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Bakaraju RC; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Tilia D; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Chung J; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Delaney S; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Munro A; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Ehrmann K; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Thomas V; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
  • Holden BA; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, Australia.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 79(2): 73-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27224066
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, stereopsis, and subjective visual performance of Acuvue® Oasys® for Presbyopia (AOP), Air Optix® Aqua Multifocal (AOMF), and Air Optix® Aqua Single Vision (AOSV) lenses in patients with presbyopia.

METHODS:

A single-blinded crossover trial was conducted. Twenty patients with mild presbyopia (add ≤+1.25 D) and 22 with moderate/severe presbyopia (add ≥+1.50 D) who wore lenses bilaterally for 1 h, with a minimum overnight washout period between the use of each lens. Measurements included high- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA and LCVA, respectively) at a distance, contrast sensitivity (CS) at a distance, HCVA at intermediate (70 cm) and near (50 cm & 40 cm) distances, stereopsis, and subjective questionnaires regarding vision clarity, ghosting, overall vision satisfaction, and comfort. The test variables were compared among the lens types using repeated-measures ANOVA.

RESULTS:

Distance variables (HCVA, LCVA, and CS) were significantly worse with multifocal lens than with AOSV lens (p≤0.008), except for AOMF lens in the mild presbyopia group in which no significant difference was observed (p>0.05). Multifocal lenses had significantly greater HCVA at 40 cm than AOSV lens (p≤0.026). AOMF lens had greater intermediate HCVA than AOP lens (p<0.03). AOP lens demonstrated greater improvements in stereopsis than AOMF and AOSV lens in the moderate/severe presbyopia group (p≤0.03). Few significant differences in subjective variables were observed, with no significant difference in the overall vision satisfaction observed between lens types (p>0.05). The proportions of patients willing to buy AOSV, AOMF, and AOP lenses were 20%, 40%, and 50%, respectively, in the mild presbyopia group and 14%, 32%, and 23%, respectively, in the moderate/severe presbyopia group; however, these differences were not statistically significant (p≥0.159).

CONCLUSIONS:

Further development of multifocal lenses is required before significant advantages of multifocal lenses over single vision lens are observed in patients with presbyopia.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Presbyopia / Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic / Equipment Design Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arq Bras Oftalmol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Presbyopia / Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic / Equipment Design Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Arq Bras Oftalmol Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia