Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of a device to narrow the coronary sinus for the treatment of refractory angina: A single-centre real-world experience.
Abawi, M; Nijhoff, F; Stella, P R; Voskuil, M; Benedetto, D; Doevendans, P A; Agostoni, P.
Affiliation
  • Abawi M; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Nijhoff F; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Stella PR; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Voskuil M; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Benedetto D; University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Doevendans PA; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Agostoni P; Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. agostonipf@gmail.com.
Neth Heart J ; 24(9): 544-51, 2016 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27299456
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The coronary sinus Reducer is a recently introduced device to treat patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable for conventional revascularisation. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients with refractory angina.

METHODS:

This is a single-centre retrospective registry. Patients with severe angina symptoms, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia using any adequate non-invasive modality and without options for conventional revascularisation were regarded eligible for Reducer implantation.

RESULTS:

Twenty-three patients (74 % male, mean age 70 ±â€¯8 years, 91.3 % previous bypass surgery, 82.6 % previous percutaneous intervention, 47.8 % previous myocardial infarction, 52.2 % diabetes mellitus) underwent Reducer implantation. The safety endpoint (successful implantation of the first device without device-related adverse events) was met in all patients. After a median follow-up of 9 (8-14) months the efficacy (any reduction in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class and revascularisation-free survival) was reached in 17 patients (74 %) 8 patients (34.8 %) improved by 1 CCS class, 7 (30.4 %) by 2 CCS classes and 2 (8.7 %) by 3 CCS classes. One patient died 4 months after implantation because of progressive heart failure (not associated with Reducer implantation).

CONCLUSION:

In this single-centre real-world experience, Reducer implantation was safe and demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of refractory angina at mid-term follow-up.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Neth Heart J Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Neth Heart J Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos