Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002).
Cheung, Irene; Campbell, Lorne; LeBel, Etienne P; Ackerman, Robert A; Aykutog˘lu, Bülent; Bahník, Steˇpán; Bowen, Jeffrey D; Bredow, Carrie A; Bromberg, Christopher; Caprariello, Peter A; Carcedo, Rodrigo J; Carson, Kevin J; Cobb, Rebecca J; Collins, Nancy L; Corretti, Conrad A; DiDonato, Theresa E; Ellithorpe, Chelsea; Fernández-Rouco, Noelia; Fuglestad, Paul T; Goldberg, Rebecca M; Golom, Frank D; Gündog˘du-Aktürk, Elçin; Hoplock, Lisa B; Houdek, Petr; Kane, Heidi S; Kim, John S; Kraus, Sue; Leone, Christopher T; Li, Norman P; Logan, Jill M; Millman, Roanne D; Morry, Marian M; Pink, Jennifer C; Ritchey, Taylor; Root Luna, Lindsey M; Sinclair, H Colleen; Stinson, Danu Anthony; Sucharyna, Tamara A; Tidwell, Natasha D; Uysal, Ahmet; Vranka, Marek; Winczewski, Lauren A; Yong, Jose C.
Affiliation
  • Cheung I; Department of Psychology, Huron University College at The University of Western Ontario icheung5@uwo.ca.
  • Campbell L; Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario.
  • LeBel EP; Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Ackerman RA; The University of Texas at Dallas
  • Aykutog˘lu B; Middle East Technical University
  • Bahník S; University of Würzburg
  • Bowen JD; University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Bredow CA; Hope College
  • Bromberg C; University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Caprariello PA; Stony Brook University
  • Carcedo RJ; University of Salamanca
  • Carson KJ; The University of Texas at Dallas
  • Cobb RJ; Simon Fraser University
  • Collins NL; University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Corretti CA; The University of Texas at Dallas
  • DiDonato TE; Loyola University Maryland
  • Ellithorpe C; Mississippi State University
  • Fernández-Rouco N; University of Cantabria
  • Fuglestad PT; University of North Florida
  • Goldberg RM; Mississippi State University
  • Golom FD; Loyola University Maryland
  • Gündog˘du-Aktürk E; Middle East Technical University
  • Hoplock LB; University of Victoria
  • Houdek P; University of Economics, Prague
  • Kane HS; The University of Texas at Dallas
  • Kim JS; Lesley University
  • Kraus S; Fort Lewis College
  • Leone CT; University of North Florida
  • Li NP; Singapore Management University
  • Logan JM; Simon Fraser University
  • Millman RD; Simon Fraser University
  • Morry MM; University of Manitoba
  • Pink JC; Simon Fraser University
  • Ritchey T; Mississippi State University
  • Root Luna LM; Hope College
  • Sinclair HC; Mississippi State University
  • Stinson DA; University of Victoria
  • Sucharyna TA; University of Manitoba
  • Tidwell ND; Fort Lewis College
  • Uysal A; Middle East Technical University
  • Vranka M; Charles University in Prague
  • Winczewski LA; University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Yong JC; Singapore Management University
Perspect Psychol Sci ; 11(5): 750-764, 2016 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27694468
ABSTRACT
Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, and Hannon (2002, Study 1) demonstrated a causal link between subjective commitment to a relationship and how people responded to hypothetical betrayals of that relationship. Participants primed to think about their commitment to their partner (high commitment) reacted to the betrayals with reduced exit and neglect responses relative to those primed to think about their independence from their partner (low commitment). The priming manipulation did not affect constructive voice and loyalty responses. Although other studies have demonstrated a correlation between subjective commitment and responses to betrayal, this study provides the only experimental evidence that inducing changes to subjective commitment can causally affect forgiveness responses. This Registered Replication Report (RRR) meta-analytically combines the results of 16 new direct replications of the original study, all of which followed a standardized, vetted, and preregistered protocol. The results showed little effect of the priming manipulation on the forgiveness outcome measures, but it also did not observe an effect of priming on subjective commitment, so the manipulation did not work as it had in the original study. We discuss possible explanations for the discrepancy between the findings from this RRR and the original study.
Subject(s)
Key words
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Interpersonal Relations Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Year: 2016 Document type: Article
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Interpersonal Relations Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Perspect Psychol Sci Year: 2016 Document type: Article