Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Alternative approaches to vertebrate ecotoxicity tests in the 21st century: A review of developments over the last 2 decades and current status.
Lillicrap, Adam; Belanger, Scott; Burden, Natalie; Pasquier, David Du; Embry, Michelle R; Halder, Marlies; Lampi, Mark A; Lee, Lucy; Norberg-King, Teresa; Rattner, Barnett A; Schirmer, Kristin; Thomas, Paul.
Affiliation
  • Lillicrap A; Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway. ali@niva.no.
  • Belanger S; Environmental Safety and Sustainability, Global Product Stewardship, Procter & Gamble, Mason, Ohio, USA.
  • Burden N; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, United Kingdom.
  • Pasquier DD; WatchFrog, Evry, France.
  • Embry MR; ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Halder M; European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
  • Lampi MA; ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Annandale, New Jersey, USA.
  • Lee L; Faculty of Science, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Norberg-King T; National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Mid-Continent Ecology Division-Duluth, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.
  • Rattner BA; Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, US Geological Survey, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.
  • Schirmer K; Eawag-Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
  • Thomas P; Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 35(11): 2637-2646, 2016 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27779828
The need for alternative approaches to the use of vertebrate animals for hazard assessment of chemicals and pollutants has become of increasing importance. It is now the first consideration when initiating a vertebrate ecotoxicity test, to ensure that unnecessary use of vertebrate organisms is minimized wherever possible. For some regulatory purposes, the use of vertebrate organisms for environmental risk assessments has been banned; in other situations, the number of organisms tested has been dramatically reduced or the severity of the procedure refined. However, there is still a long way to go to achieve a complete replacement of vertebrate organisms to generate environmental hazard data. The development of animal alternatives is based not just on ethical considerations but also on reducing the cost of performing vertebrate ecotoxicity tests and in some cases on providing better information aimed at improving environmental risk assessments. The present Focus article provides an overview of the considerable advances that have been made toward alternative approaches for ecotoxicity assessments over the last few decades. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2637-2646. © 2016 SETAC.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Toxicity Tests / Animal Testing Alternatives Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Noruega Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Toxicity Tests / Animal Testing Alternatives Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Environ Toxicol Chem Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Noruega Country of publication: Estados Unidos