Single-center comparison of multiple chemotherapy regimens for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To date, the best chemotherapy regimen to combine with concurrent radiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer remains undetermined. We compared the survival outcomes and toxicities in patients who were treated with etoposide-cisplatin (EP), paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC), or vinblastine-cisplatin (VP) in one large cancer referral center. METHODS: We enrolled patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our university-affiliated hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Demographic and clinical characteristics were identified. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the different treatment groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Treatment-related toxicities were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were treated with EP (31.8%), PC (32.7%) or VP (35.5%). Treatment with VP was significantly superior to PC, both in terms of median PFS [29.2 vs. 10.5 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.85; p = 0.01] and in terms of median OS [40.7 vs. 17.8 months; (HR) 0.42; (0.21-0.84); p = 0.01]. However, there was no survival difference between EP and either one of the other regimens, but there was significantly more toxicities reported with the use of EP (73.5%) compared to PC (44.7%) or VP (37.1%); (p = 0.001). The most frequent non-hematologic toxicities for the entire cohort were esophagitis (28%), fatigue (22.4%), pneumonitis (14%), and nephrotoxicity (9.3%). CONCLUSION: Although the present study is limited by its small cohort and its retrospective nature, the results suggest that VP might be superior to PC and is less toxic than EP.