Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Natural history of severe aortic stenosis: Diastolic wall strain as a novel prognostic marker.
Obasare, Edinrin; Bhalla, Vikas; Gajanana, Deepakraj; Rodriguez Ziccardi, Mary; Codolosa, Jose N; Figueredo, Vincent M; Morris, Dennis Lynn; Pressman, Gregg S.
Affiliation
  • Obasare E; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Bhalla V; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Gajanana D; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Rodriguez Ziccardi M; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Codolosa JN; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Figueredo VM; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Morris DL; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Pressman GS; Einstein Heart and Vascular Institute, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Echocardiography ; 34(4): 484-490, 2017 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28247566
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Diastolic wall strain (DWS) has been proposed as a simple noninvasive measure of left ventricular (LV) stiffness. This study investigated DWS as a possible predictor of mortality in severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: 138 patients with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area [AVA]<0.6 cm2 /m2 ) and normal ejection fraction (>55%) were included. 52 patients (38%) had aortic valve interventions or poor image quality (n=5) and were excluded leaving 86 in the study group (84±8 years, 70% female, 69% African American). DWS was defined as (LVPWs-LVPWd)/LVPWs where LVPWs=left ventricular posterior wall thickness in systole and LVPWd=left ventricular wall thickness in diastole. RESULTS: Follow-up extended 2.0±1.9 years (median 1.6 years). Mean DWS for the group was 0.21±0.11 (normal=0.4±0.07). In patients who died, DWS was significantly lower than in survivors (0.18±0.09 vs 0.24±0.11, P=.02). By contrast, traditional measures of diastolic dysfunction did not predict death. Regression analysis showed DWS predicted death even after adjusting for age, sex, race, indexed AVA, symptoms (angina, shortness of breath, dizziness, syncope), and clinical factors (creatinine, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia) (HR 2.5 [95% CI 1.02-5.90], P<.05). The best cutoff value for DWS of 0.25 had a sensitivity of 42% and specificity of 83% for predicting death. CONCLUSIONS: DWS is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with severe AS, even after accounting for traditional clinical and echocardiographic parameters.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Valve Stenosis / Echocardiography Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Echocardiography Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aortic Valve Stenosis / Echocardiography Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Echocardiography Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos