Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An anatomical subunit-based outcome assessment scale for bilateral cleft lip and palate.
Bonanthaya, K; Shetty, P N; Fudalej, P S; Rao, D D; Bitra, S; Pabari, M; Rachwalski, M.
Affiliation
  • Bonanthaya K; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bangalore Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India; Smile Train Cleft Palate Centre, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bangalore, India.
  • Shetty PN; Smile Train Cleft Palate Centre, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bangalore, India.
  • Fudalej PS; Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University of Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Rao DD; Smile Train Cleft Palate Centre, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bangalore, India.
  • Bitra S; Smile Train Cleft Palate Centre, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bangalore, India.
  • Pabari M; Smile Train Cleft Palate Centre, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain Hospital, Bangalore, India. Electronic address: mansipabari@gmail.com.
  • Rachwalski M; National Reference Center for Cleft Lip and Palate, Department of Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 46(8): 988-992, 2017 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28408147
ABSTRACT
As there is currently no internationally accepted outcome measurement tool available for complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (CBCLP), the goal of this prospective study was to develop a numerical evaluation scale that allows reliable scoring of this cleft deformity. Our cohort comprised 121 Indian subjects with CBCLP who underwent surgical repair (mean age at time of surgery 6.53 months) using a modified Millard technique. A panel of three professionals evaluated each subject's outcome of bilateral cleft lip repair 6 months postoperatively on two-dimensional (2D) full-face photographs in the frontal view and worm's eye view. A simple two-point rating system was applied to separately analyse a total of 12 components of lip, nose, and scar. The results and mean scores for the analysed anatomical areas were 2.2±1.01 (max=3) for nose, 5.4±1.54 (max=8) for lip, and 1.9±1.3 (max=3) for scar, with a total score 7.7±2.21 (max=12) indicating a good surgical outcome. The inter-examiner ICC for nose, lip, scar, and total score was calculated at 0.836, 0.889, 0.723, and 0.927 respectively and indicated a strong level of repeatability and reliability that was highly significant (P<0.001). In conclusion, we were able to develop and test a scoring system for measuring outcomes in CBCLP that warrants simplicity of use, reliability and reproducibility.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cleft Lip / Cleft Palate Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cleft Lip / Cleft Palate Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Infant / Male Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: India