Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cerebellar patients do not benefit from cerebellar or M1 transcranial direct current stimulation during force-field reaching adaptation.
Hulst, Thomas; John, Liane; Küper, Michael; van der Geest, Jos N; Göricke, Sophia L; Donchin, Opher; Timmann, Dagmar.
Affiliation
  • Hulst T; Department of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; thomas.hulst@uk-essen.de.
  • John L; Erasmus University College, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Küper M; Department of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • van der Geest JN; Department of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Göricke SL; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Donchin O; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; and.
  • Timmann D; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
J Neurophysiol ; 118(2): 732-748, 2017 08 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28469001
ABSTRACT
Several studies have identified transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a potential tool in the rehabilitation of cerebellar disease. Here, we tested whether tDCS could alleviate motor impairments of subjects with cerebellar degeneration. Three groups took part in this study 20 individuals with cerebellar degeneration, 20 age-matched controls, and 30 young controls. A standard reaching task with force-field perturbations was used to compare motor adaptation among groups and to measure the effect of stimulation of the cerebellum or primary motor cortex (M1). Cerebellar subjects and age-matched controls were tested during each stimulation type (cerebellum, M1, and sham) with a break of 1 wk among each of the three sessions. Young controls were tested during one session under one of three stimulation types (anodal cerebellum, cathodal cerebellum, or sham). As expected, individuals with cerebellar degeneration had a reduced ability to adapt to motor perturbations. Importantly, cerebellar patients did not benefit from anodal stimulation of the cerebellum or M1. Furthermore, no stimulation effects could be detected in aging and young controls. The present null results cannot exclude more subtle tDCS effects in larger subject populations and between-subject designs. Moreover, it is still possible that tDCS affects motor adaptation in cerebellar subjects and control subjects under a different task or with alternative stimulation parameters. However, for tDCS to become a valuable tool in the neurorehabilitation of cerebellar disease, stimulation effects should be present in group sizes commonly used in this rare patient population and be more consistent and predictable across subjects and tasks.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been identified as a potential tool in the rehabilitation of cerebellar disease. We investigated whether tDCS of the cerebellum and primary motor cortex could alleviate motor impairments of subjects with cerebellar degeneration. The present study did not find stimulation effects of tDCS in young controls, aging controls, and individuals with cerebellar degeneration during reach adaptation. Our results require a re-evaluation of the clinical potential of tDCS in cerebellar patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Adaptation, Physiological / Spinocerebellar Degenerations / Cerebellum / Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Motor Activity / Motor Cortex Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurophysiol Year: 2017 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Adaptation, Physiological / Spinocerebellar Degenerations / Cerebellum / Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation / Motor Activity / Motor Cortex Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Neurophysiol Year: 2017 Document type: Article