Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frailty status at admission to hospital predicts multiple adverse outcomes.
Hubbard, Ruth E; Peel, Nancye M; Samanta, Mayukh; Gray, Leonard C; Mitnitski, Arnold; Rockwood, Kenneth.
Affiliation
  • Hubbard RE; Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Peel NM; Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Samanta M; Clinical Trials and Biostatistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
  • Gray LC; Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
  • Mitnitski A; Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Rockwood K; Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Age Ageing ; 46(5): 801-806, 2017 09 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28531254
ABSTRACT

Aims:

frailty is proposed as a summative measure of health status and marker of individual vulnerability. We aimed to investigate the discriminative capacity of a frailty index (FI) derived from interRAI Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Acute Care (AC) in relation to multiple adverse inpatient outcomes.

Methods:

in this prospective cohort study, an FI was derived for 1,418 patients ≥70 years across 11 hospitals in Australia. The interRAI-AC was administered at admission and discharge by trained nurses, who also screened patients daily for geriatric syndromes.

Results:

in adjusted logistic regression models an increase of 0.1 in FI was significantly associated with increased likelihood of length of stay >28 days (odds ratio [OR] 1.29 [1.10-1.52]), new discharge to residential aged care (OR 1.31 [1.10-1.57]), in-hospital falls (OR 1.29 [1.10-1.50]), delirium (OR 2.34 [2.08-2.63]), pressure ulcer incidence (OR 1.51 [1.23-1.87]) and inpatient mortality (OR 2.01 [1.66-2.42]). For each of these adverse outcomes, the cut-point at which optimal sensitivity and specificity occurred was for an FI > 0.40. Specificity was higher than sensitivity with positive predictive values of 7-52% and negative predictive values of 88-98%. FI-AC was not significantly associated with readmissions to hospital.

Conclusions:

the interRAI-AC can be used to derive a single score that predicts multiple adverse outcomes in older inpatients. A score of ≤0.40 can well discriminate patients who are unlikely to die or experience a geriatric syndrome. Whether the FI-AC can result in management decisions that improve outcomes requires further study.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Admission / Geriatric Assessment / Frail Elderly / Frailty Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Age Ageing Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Admission / Geriatric Assessment / Frail Elderly / Frailty Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: Age Ageing Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Australia