Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography on upper airway changes after alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction].
Chang, D T; Zhou, Y H; Liu, W T.
Affiliation
  • Chang DT; Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100181, China.
  • Zhou YH; Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100181, China.
  • Liu WT; Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100181, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 49(4): 685-690, 2017 08 18.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28816289
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the changes of different parts of upper airway after alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction via three dimensional measurement, compared with the protocol of rapid palatal expansion alone.

METHODS:

In the study, 36 patients with retrognathic maxilla were selected and randomized to either group A or group B. The patients in group A were treated with rapid palatal expansion alone. The patients in group B were treated with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction. Three dimensional analyses were performed on all pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with the software Dolphin.

RESULTS:

Two subjects in group B were lost to follow up during the treatment. The gender distributions, ages and all measuring items before treatment had no significant difference between group A and group B (P>0.05). Nasal floor width, nasal lateral width, nasal volume, and nasopharynx volume increased significantly in each group after rapid palatal expansion alone or rapid palatal expansion and constriction (P<0.05). The variations of oropharyngeal volume and hypopharyngeal volume had no significant difference (P>0.05). No significant difference was observed in the nasal floor width and nasal lateral width increment among the anterior, median and posterior parts in each group either (P>0.05). No significant difference in all the measuring items was observed between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction could increase the volume of nasal and naopharynx cavities by the similar way of rapid palatal expansion alone, and had no obvious effect on oropharynx and hypopharynx cavities.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palatal Expansion Technique / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Nasal Cavity Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Humans Language: Zh Journal: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palatal Expansion Technique / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Nasal Cavity Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limits: Humans Language: Zh Journal: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China