Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF Symptom Validity Scale (FBS/FBS-r) is not a measure of 'litigation response syndrome': commentary on Nichols and Gass (2015).
Larrabee, Glenn J; Bianchini, Kevin J; Boone, Kyle B; Rohling, Martin L.
Affiliation
  • Larrabee GJ; a Independent Practice , Sarasota , FL , USA.
  • Bianchini KJ; b Jefferson Neurobehavioral Group , Metairie , LA , USA.
  • Boone KB; c Independent Practice , Torrance , CA , USA.
  • Rohling ML; d Psychology Department , University of South Alabama , Mobile , AL , USA.
Clin Neuropsychol ; 31(8): 1387-1395, 2017 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28829224
OBJECTIVES: To address (1) Whether there is empirical evidence for the contention of Nichols and Gass that the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF FBS/FBS-r Symptom Validity Scale is a measure of Litigation Response Syndrome (LRS), representing a credible set of responses and reactions of claimants to the experience of being in litigation, rather than a measure of non-credible symptom report, as the scale is typically used; and (2) to address their stated concerns about the validity of FBS/FBS-r meta-analytic results, and the risk of false positive elevations in persons with bona-fide medical conditions. METHOD: Review of published literature on the FBS/FBS-r, focusing in particular on associations between scores on this symptom validity test and scores on performance validity tests (PVTs), and FBS/FBS-r score elevations in patients with genuine neurologic, psychiatric and medical problems. RESULTS: (1) several investigations show significant associations between FBS/FBS-r scores and PVTs measuring non-credible performance; (2) litigants who pass PVTs do not produce significant elevations on FBS/FBS-r; (3) non-litigating medical patients (bariatric surgery candidates, persons with sleep disorders, and patients with severe traumatic brain injury) who have multiple physical, emotional and cognitive symptoms do not produce significant elevations on FBS/FBS-r. Two meta-analytic studies show large effect sizes for FBS/FBS-r of similar magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: FBS/FBS-r measures non-credible symptom report rather than legitimate experience of litigation stress. Importantly, the absence of significant FBS/FBS-r elevations in litigants who pass PVTs demonstrating credible performance, directly contradicts the contention of Nichols and Gass that the scale measures LRS. These data, meta-analytic publications, and recent test use surveys support the admissibility of FBS/FBS-r under both Daubert and the older Frye criteria.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sleep Wake Disorders / Malingering Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sleep Wake Disorders / Malingering Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2017 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido