Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benefits of incorporating the adaptive dynamic range optimization amplification scheme into an assistive listening device for people with mild or moderate hearing loss.
Chang, Hung-Yue; Luo, Ching-Hsing; Lo, Tun-Shin; Chen, Hsiao-Chuan; Huang, Kuo-You; Liao, Wen-Huei; Su, Mao-Chang; Liu, Shu-Yu; Wang, Nan-Mai.
Affiliation
  • Chang HY; a Department of Electrical Engineering , National Cheng-Kung University , Tainan , Taiwan.
  • Luo CH; a Department of Electrical Engineering , National Cheng-Kung University , Tainan , Taiwan.
  • Lo TS; b School of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology , Chung Shan Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
  • Chen HC; c Dept. of Otolaryngology , Chung Shan Medical University Hospital , Taichung , Taiwan.
  • Huang KY; d Graduate Institute of Audiology and Speech Therapy , National Kaohsiung Normal University , Kaohsiung , Taiwan.
  • Liao WH; b School of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology , Chung Shan Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
  • Su MC; e School of Medicine , National Yang Ming University , Taipei , Taiwan.
  • Liu SY; f Department of Otolaryngology , Taipei Veterans General Hospital , Taipei , Taiwan.
  • Wang NM; b School of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology , Chung Shan Medical University , Taichung , Taiwan.
Assist Technol ; 30(5): 226-232, 2018.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28846498
ABSTRACT
This study investigated whether a self-designed assistive listening device (ALD) that incorporates an adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) amplification strategy can surpass a commercially available monaurally worn linear ALD, SM100. Both subjective and objective measurements were implemented. Mandarin Hearing-In-Noise Test (MHINT) scores were the objective measurement, whereas participant satisfaction was the subjective measurement. The comparison was performed in a mixed design (i.e., subjects' hearing status being mild or moderate, quiet versus noisy, and linear versus ADRO scheme). The participants were two groups of hearing-impaired subjects, nine mild and eight moderate, respectively. The results of the ADRO system revealed a significant difference in the MHINT sentence reception threshold (SRT) in noisy environments between monaurally aided and unaided conditions, whereas the linear system did not. The benchmark results showed that the ADRO scheme is effectively beneficial to people who experience mild or moderate hearing loss in noisy environments. The satisfaction rating regarding overall speech quality indicated that the participants were satisfied with the speech quality of both ADRO and linear schemes in quiet environments, and they were more satisfied with ADRO than they with the linear scheme in noisy environments.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted / Communication Aids for Disabled / Hearing Loss Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Assist Technol Journal subject: REABILITACAO Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted / Communication Aids for Disabled / Hearing Loss Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Assist Technol Journal subject: REABILITACAO Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán