Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-operative treatment as a strategy for patients with parastomal hernia: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.
Kroese, L F; Lambrichts, D P V; Jeekel, J; Kleinrensink, G J; Menon, A G; de Graaf, E J R; Bemelman, W A; Lange, J F.
Affiliation
  • Kroese LF; Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lambrichts DPV; Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Jeekel J; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Kleinrensink GJ; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Menon AG; Department of Surgery, Havenziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Graaf EJR; Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
  • Bemelman WA; Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
  • Lange JF; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Colorectal Dis ; 20(6): 545-551, 2018 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29150969
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Parastomal hernia is the most common complication following stoma construction. Surgical treatment is usually chosen over non-operative treatment, but a clear rationale for the choice of management is often lacking. This study aims to investigate the reasons for non-operative treatment, cross-over rates and postoperative complications.

METHOD:

A multicentre, retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients diagnosed with a parastomal hernia between January 2007 and December 2012 were included. Data on baseline characteristics, primary surgery and hernias were collected. For non-operative treatment, reasons for this treatment and cross-over rates were evaluated. For all patients undergoing surgery (surgical treatment and cross-overs), complication and recurrence rates were analysed.

RESULTS:

Of the 80 patients included, 42 (53%) were in the surgical treatment group and 38 (48%) in the non-operative treatment group. Median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range 24-72). The reasons for non-operative treatment were absence of symptoms in 12 patients (32%), comorbidities in nine (24%) and patient preference in three (7.9%). In 14 patients (37%) reasons were not documented. Eight patients (21%) crossed over from non-operative treatment to surgical treatment, of whom one needed emergency surgery. In 23 patients (55%), parastomal hernia recurred after the original surgical treatment, of whom 21 (91%) underwent additional repair.

CONCLUSION:

Parastomal hernia repair is associated with high recurrence and additional repair rates. Non-operative treatment has a relatively low cross-over and emergency surgery rate. Given these data, non-operative treatment might be a better choice for patients without complaints or with comorbidities.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ostomy / Hernia, Abdominal / Surgical Stomas / Herniorrhaphy / Incisional Hernia Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ostomy / Hernia, Abdominal / Surgical Stomas / Herniorrhaphy / Incisional Hernia Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Colorectal Dis Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos