Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilization and Survival of Postoperative Radiation or Chemoradiation for pT1-2N1M0 Head and Neck Cancer.
Lee, Anna; Givi, Babak; Roden, Dylan F; Tam, Moses M; Wu, S Peter; Gerber, Naamit K; Hu, Kenneth S; Schreiber, David.
Affiliation
  • Lee A; 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
  • Givi B; 2 Department of Veterans Affairs, New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
  • Roden DF; 3 Department of Otolaryngology, New York School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Tam MM; 3 Department of Otolaryngology, New York School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Wu SP; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, New York School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Gerber NK; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, New York School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Hu KS; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, New York School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Schreiber D; 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, New York School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 158(4): 677-684, 2018 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29256329
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the patterns of care and survival for pT1-2N1M0 head and neck cancer based on receipt of surgery alone, surgery + postoperative radiotherapy (S + RT), or surgery + postoperative chemoradiotherapy (S + CRT). Study Design Retrospective analysis. Setting National Cancer Database. Subjects and Methods We queried the database for patients with stage pT1-2N1M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx between 2004 and 2012 who were treated with surgery with negative margins and no extracapsular extension. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of receipt of postoperative treatment. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression analysis identified covariates that affected it. Results There were 1598 patients included in this study 566 (35.4%) received surgery alone; 726 (45.4%), S + RT; and 306 (19.1%), S + CRT. The 5-year overall survival was 68.8%, 74.0%, and 87.8%, respectively ( P = .009 comparing S + RT and surgery alone, P < .001 for all other comparisons). On multivariable logistic regression, academic centers were associated with a decreased likelihood of S + RT (odds ratio = 0.71) and S + CRT (odds ratio = 0.66). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated no difference in survival for S + RT over surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.70-1.09, P = .24); however, there was a survival benefit associated with S + CRT (hazard ratio = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.39-0.81, P = .002). Conclusion Nearly 65% of patients with pT1-2N1 head and neck cancer with negative margins and no extracapsular extension received S + RT or S + CRT. Improvement in survival was noted only for patients who received S + CRT.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Head and Neck Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Head and Neck Neoplasms Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Journal subject: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos