Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How much of the invader's genetic variability can slip between our fingers? A case study of secondary dispersal of Poa annua on King George Island (Antarctica).
Wódkiewicz, Maciej; Chwedorzewska, Katarzyna J; Bednarek, Piotr T; Znój, Anna; Androsiuk, Piotr; Galera, Halina.
Affiliation
  • Wódkiewicz M; Biological and Chemical Research Centre Faculty of Biology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland.
  • Chwedorzewska KJ; Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland.
  • Bednarek PT; Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute - National Research Institute Blonie Poland.
  • Znój A; Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland.
  • Androsiuk P; Department of Plant Physiology, Genetics and Biotechnology University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn Olsztyn Poland.
  • Galera H; Biological and Chemical Research Centre Faculty of Biology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland.
Ecol Evol ; 8(1): 592-600, 2018 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29321896
ABSTRACT
We studied an invasion of Poa annua on King George Island (Maritime Antarctic). The remoteness of this location, its geographic isolation, and its limited human traffic provided an opportunity to trace the history of an invasion of the species. Poa annua was recorded for the first time at H. Arctowski Polish Antarctic Station in the austral summer of 1985/6. In 2008/9, the species was observed in a new locality at the Ecology Glacier Forefield (1.5 km from "Arctowski"). We used AFLP to analyze the genetic differences among three populations of P. annua the two mentioned above (Station and Forefield) and the putative origin of the introduction, Warsaw (Poland). There was 38% genetic variance among the populations. Pairwise ФPT was 0.498 between the Forefield and Warsaw populations and 0.283 between Warsaw and Station. There were 15 unique bands in the Warsaw population (frequency from 6% to 100%) and one in the Station/Forefield populations (which appears in all analyzed individuals from both populations). The Δ(K) parameter indicated two groups of samples Warsaw/Station and Forefield. As indicated by Fu's Fs statistics and an analysis of mismatch distribution, the Forefield population underwent a bottleneck and/or founder effect. The Forefield population was likely introduced by secondary dispersal from the Station population.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ecol Evol Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ecol Evol Year: 2018 Document type: Article
...