Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Coadministration of probenecid and cimetidine with mirogabalin in healthy subjects: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, drug-drug interaction study.
Tachibana, Masaya; Yamamura, Naotoshi; Atiee, George J; Hsu, Ching; Warren, Vance; He, Ling; Dishy, Victor; Zahir, Hamim.
Affiliation
  • Tachibana M; Clinical Pharmacology Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yamamura N; Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Atiee GJ; Worldwide Clinical Trials, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Hsu C; Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
  • Warren V; Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
  • He L; Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
  • Dishy V; Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
  • Zahir H; Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 84(10): 2317-2324, 2018 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29920736
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

The primary aim of this study was to assess the individual effects of probenecid and cimetidine on mirogabalin exposure.

METHODS:

This phase 1, open-label, crossover study randomized healthy adults to receive three treatment regimens, each separated by ≥5-day washout a single oral dose of mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2, mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus probenecid 500 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4, and mirogabalin 15 mg on day 2 plus cimetidine 400 mg every 6 h from days 1 to 4.

RESULTS:

Coadministration of mirogabalin with probenecid or cimetidine increased the maximum and total mirogabalin exposure. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of probenecid were 128.7% (121.9-135.7%) and 176.1% (171.9-180.3%), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0-t) (90% CI) with and without coadministration of cimetidine were 117.1% (111.0-123.6%) and 143.7% (140.3-147.2%), respectively. Mean (standard deviation) renal clearance of mirogabalin (l h-1 ) was substantially slower after probenecid [6.67 (1.53)] or cimetidine [7.17 (1.68)] coadministration, compared with mirogabalin alone [11.3 (2.39)]. Coadministration of probenecid or cimetidine decreased mirogabalin mean (standard deviation) apparent total body clearance [10.5 (2.33) and 12.8 (2.67) l h-1 , respectively, vs. 18.4 (3.93) for mirogabalin alone].

CONCLUSIONS:

A greater magnitude of change in mirogabalin exposure was observed when coadministered with a drug that inhibits both renal and metabolic clearance (probenecid) vs. a drug that only affects renal clearance (cimetidine). However, as the increase in exposure is not clinically significant (>2-fold), no a priori dose adjustment is recommended.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bridged Bicyclo Compounds / Metabolic Clearance Rate / Probenecid / Cimetidine Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japón Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bridged Bicyclo Compounds / Metabolic Clearance Rate / Probenecid / Cimetidine Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japón Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM