Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Diagnostic Value of IGF-I, ß2-MG and SF for Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Their Relationship with Clinical Staging].
Wu, Xiao-Ying; Shi, Ju-Mei; Tao, Yi; Li, Zhong.
Affiliation
  • Wu XY; The Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China; Shanghai Armed Police Hospital, Shanghai 201103, China.
  • Shi JM; The Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China.
  • Tao Y; The Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China. E-mail: smmu018@ 163.com.
  • Li Z; Information Center of The Third People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi ; 26(3): 802-806, 2018 Jun.
Article in Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29950223
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the diagnostic value of insulin like growth factor I(IGF-I), ß2-microglobulin (ß2MG) and serum ferritin (SF) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and their ralationship with clinical staging.

METHODS:

Seventy-seven patients with MM treated in Depertment of Hematology of Shanghai 10th hospital and Oncology of Shanghai Armed Police Hospital from August 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled in MM group, at same period 77 healthy volunteers were enrolled in normal control group. The diagnostic value of IGF-I, ß2-MG and SF for MM, and their levels in different stages of MM were compared.

RESULTS:

The ROC analysis showed that ß2-MG and SF alone as well as their combination had the diagnostic significance for MM, moreover the diagnostic value of IGF-I, ß2-MG and SF combination was highest, but the single IGF-I did not possess diagnostic significance for MM. The comparison of IGF-I, ß2-MG and SF levels in different stages of MM showed that the ß2-MG and SF levels in I stage were higher than those in normal control group (P<0.05), but lower than those in II and III stages (P<0.05). The IGF-I level in I stage was not statistically and significantly different from IGF-I level in normal control group (P>0.05), but lower than those in II and III stage (P<0.05). The relationship analysis between IGF-I and ß2-MG, SF in different stages showed that the IGF-I related with SF in I stage (r=0.417), but did not relate with ß2-MG; the IGF-I in II stage related with ß2-MG and SF in II stage (r=0.543, r=0.426); IGF-I related with ß2-MG and SF in III stage (r=0.425 and r=0.672).

CONCLUSION:

The diagnostic value of IGF-I, ß2-MG and SF alone does not high for MM, but their combination can significantly enhance the occurate rate of MM diagnosis. The levels of IGF-I, ß2-MG and SF in II and III stages of MM all increase, moreover the level of IGF-I correlates with the levels of ß2-MG and SF.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Multiple Myeloma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Zh Journal: Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Multiple Myeloma Type of study: Diagnostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: Zh Journal: Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China