Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preserving fertility in an unconscious patient with Goodpasture syndrome-medicolegal and ethical aspects.
Stark, Doreen; Stiller, Ruth; Xie, Min; Weber, Damian; Maggiorini, Marco; Hilty, Matthias Peter.
Affiliation
  • Stark D; 1Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Stiller R; 2Department of Reproduction Endocrinology, University Hospital of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Xie M; 2Department of Reproduction Endocrinology, University Hospital of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Weber D; 3Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Maggiorini M; 1Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hilty MP; 1Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Intensive Care ; 6: 40, 2018.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30062013
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Every day in the ICU, legal issues arise while treating sedated, unconscious, and legally incapacitated patients. Whenever a life-saving treatment cannot be discussed in a timely manner with an unconscious patient, doctors are required by law to act according to the substituted judgment standard. However, if it is not survival that is at stake, but conservation of reproduction and the potential side effects are significant, the decision-making process becomes much more difficult. Legal issues associated with possible harm to the patient on the one hand and ethical issues with presumable benefit of the intervention on the other hand give rise to difficult decisions. CASE PRESENTATION We present the case of a 24-year-old patient with Goodpasture syndrome. Because of rapid aggravation of kidney function and alveolar hemorrhage-the latter requiring an urgent initiation of mechanical ventilation-therapy with steroids, plasmapheresis, and cyclophosphamide was immediately required. Knowledge of the negative impact on fertility brought up the question about sperm cryopreservation. According to the substituted judgment standard, together with the mother of the patient and based on interdisciplinary evaluation of the situation with specialists from the reproductive endocrinology and urology department, the decision for a testicular sperm extraction in the absence of the possibility to obtain the patient's informed consent was made. Immediate chemotherapy was initiated and continued after the procedure. The patient recovered from the acute illness and was informed retrospectively about the testicular sperm extraction, which he received extremely positively.

CONCLUSION:

Our aim is to highlight the legal objectives and ethical aspects of a non-lifesaving but fertility-preserving intervention in an unconscious patient. The need for decision-making in this kind of situation is rare and therefore challenging. The present case may serve to encourage and guide other doctors in similar situations.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: J Intensive Care Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suiza Country of publication: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: J Intensive Care Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Suiza Country of publication: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM