Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Histological and micro-CT analysis of peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing on implants with different healing abutments configurations.
Souza, André Barbisan; Alshihri, AbdulMonem; Kämmerer, Peer W; Araújo, Maurício G; Gallucci, German O.
Affiliation
  • Souza AB; Division of Regenerative and Implant Sciences, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Alshihri A; Division of Regenerative and Implant Sciences, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Kämmerer PW; Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterial Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Araújo MG; Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Germany.
  • Gallucci GO; Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 29(10): 1007-1015, 2018 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246409
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different abutment configurations on peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Two-piece dental implants, 3.5 mm in diameter and 8 mm in length, were placed in four beagle dogs. Two different transmucosal healing abutment configurations were randomly selected one with a wide emergence profile (WE) (45° angulation with implant long axis) and the other with a narrow emergence profile (NE) (15° angulation with implant long axis). After four months of healing, the animals were sacrificed. Micro-CT scans were taken for mesio-distal analysis; subsequently, the biopsies were prepared for bucco-lingual histometric analyses. Several measurements were taken using the following reference points marginal mucosal level (MML), apical barrier epithelium (aBE), implant shoulder (IS), marginal bone crest (BC), and first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC).

RESULTS:

In the micro-CT analysis, the distance from IS-fBIC was 1.11 ± 0.66 mm for WE and 0.12 ± 0.21 mm for NE (p = 0.004). The IS-BC of WE was -0.54 ± 0.80 mm, whereas NE presented 0.76 ± 0.48 mm (p = 0.002). The histometric analysis showed that both groups presented comparable dimensions of peri-implant biologic width (p > 0.05). However, in the distance from IS to BC, the WE showed a mean distance of -0.66 ± 0.78 mm while NE was 0.06 ± 0.42 mm (p = 0.039); the IS to fBIC was 0.89 ± 0.68 mm for WE while NE was 0.30 ± 0.30 mm (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION:

The design of the transmucosal component can influence the establishment of the peri-implant biologic width. The flat and wide emergence profile induced an apical displacement of the peri-implant biologic width and more bone loss.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Periodontium / Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Alveolar Process / Dental Implant-Abutment Design Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Periodontium / Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Alveolar Process / Dental Implant-Abutment Design Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2018 Document type: Article