Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brief report of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for men with advanced prostate cancer: Acceptability and efficacy by race.
Bouchard, Laura C; Yanez, Betina; Dahn, Jason R; Flury, Sarah C; Perry, Kent T; Mohr, David C; Penedo, Frank J.
Affiliation
  • Bouchard LC; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Yanez B; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Dahn JR; Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences Service, Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Flury SC; Department of Urology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Perry KT; Department of Urology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Mohr DC; Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Penedo FJ; Departments of Psychology and Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Transl Behav Med ; 9(4): 629-637, 2019 07 16.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30285186
Relative to non-Hispanic whites (NHW), black men are disproportionately affected by prostate cancer (PC) incidence, have poorer PC outcomes, and report greater compromises in health-related quality of life. Despite these challenges, black men are underrepresented in psychosocial cancer research, possibly due to limited access to supportive oncology programs. The purpose of this article is to examine the acceptability and efficacy for reducing disease-specific distress of a tablet-delivered psychosocial intervention for older men with advanced PC (APC) and explore differences by race. Men with APC (N = 192, 37.5% black, age M = 68.84 years) were randomized to 10-week Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) or attention-control Health Promotion (HP), both delivered via tablets. Assessments occurred at baseline in person, weekly during the 10-week program via tablets, and at 6 and 12 months in person. Weekly session evaluations and postprogram exit surveys assessed acceptability. Efficacy was assessed with a measure of PC-anxiety validated with racially diverse PC patients using linear mixed effects modeling. Study retention and group attendance did not differ by race. CBSM and HP were both acceptable among older APC patients. Black men rated both conditions more favorably than NHW men. Men in CBSM (vs. HP) reported greater reductions in PC-anxiety at 6 months (not sustained at 12 months). Black men in CBSM reported greater decreases in PC-anxiety over time compared with all other groups. Tablet-delivered CBSM and HP were acceptable for black and NHW APC patients, although black men rated both conditions more favorably. Black men reported a unique intervention benefit related to reduced disease-specific distress.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anxiety / Prostatic Neoplasms / Black or African American / Computers, Handheld Type of study: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transl Behav Med Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Anxiety / Prostatic Neoplasms / Black or African American / Computers, Handheld Type of study: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transl Behav Med Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Reino Unido