Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Am I Being Understood? Veterinary Students' Perceptions of the Relationship between Their Language Background, Communication Ability, and Clinical Learning.
King, Eva; Henning, Joerg; Green, Wendy J; Turpin, Merrill J; Schull, Daniel N.
Affiliation
  • King E; School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, Gatton QLD 4343, Australia. Email: e.king3@uq.edu.au .
  • Henning J; School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
  • Green WJ; Tasmanian Institute of Learning and Teaching, University of Tasmania, Newnham Campus, Launceston, TAS 7001, Australia.
  • Turpin MJ; School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, St Lucia, QLD 4067 Australia.
  • Schull DN; School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
J Vet Med Educ ; 46(1): 35-44, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30285596
ABSTRACT
During clinical workplace learning, effective communication between veterinary students and clinical staff is of paramount importance to facilitating learning, assessment, and patient care. Although studies in health sciences education have indicated that students may experience communication difficulties as a result of linguistic, cultural, and other factors and that these difficulties can affect clinical learning and academic outcomes, this has not yet been explored in veterinary clinical educational contexts. In this study, the authors sought to identify whether final-year veterinary students perceived that their communication ability influenced their clinical learning and, if so, whether language background was of significance. Seventy-one students from a final-year cohort at an Australian veterinary school completed a student perception survey at the end of their clinical training. Exploratory factor analysis was used to investigate the extent to which learners perceived that their communication ability influenced their clinical learning. Two factors explained 72.3% of total variance. Factor 1 related to communication ability as a source of concern; Factor 2 related to comprehending and contributing to clinical conversations. Communication ability as a source of concern differed significantly ( p < .001) between students who did and did not have an English-speaking background, but there was no significant difference between these two student groups for Factor 2. Although language background was associated with self-perceived communication ability, evidence also emerged that students may experience communication challenges during clinical learning, irrespective of their language background.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students / Communication / Education, Veterinary Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Animals / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: J Vet Med Educ Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students / Communication / Education, Veterinary Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limits: Animals / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: En Journal: J Vet Med Educ Year: 2019 Document type: Article