Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of in ovo administration of different synbiotics on carcass and meat quality traits in broiler chickens.
Tavaniello, S; Mucci, R; Stadnicka, K; Acaye, O; Bednarczyk, M; Maiorano, G.
Affiliation
  • Tavaniello S; Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
  • Mucci R; Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
  • Stadnicka K; Department of Animal Biochemistry and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Acaye O; Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
  • Bednarczyk M; Department of Animal Biochemistry and Biotechnology, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Maiorano G; Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Poult Sci ; 98(1): 464-472, 2019 Jan 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30690616
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to examine the effect of in ovo synbiotic administration on slaughter performance and meat quality traits of broiler chickens. On day 12 of incubation, 5,850 eggs (Cobb 500 FF) were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and automatically injected in ovo with physiological saline (control, C) and 2 different synbiotic formulations (SYN1 Lactobacillus salivarius + galactooligosaccharides; SYN2 Lactobacillus plantarum + raffinose family oligosaccharides). After hatching, 240 males were randomly chosen (80 chicks per group) and split into 8 replicate pens (10 birds per pen). At 42 d of age, 15 birds per treatment were weighed and slaughtered. In ovo synbiotic administration had a low effect on investigated traits, but depends on the kind of synbiotic administered. Both synbiotic formulations did not affect final BW, weight, and yield of carcass and pectoral muscle (PM); likewise, physicochemical properties (pH, color, water holding capacity), intramuscular collagen properties, and cholesterol content of PM were not affected by treatment. Synbiotic administration reduced (P = 0.061) the lipid content compared with C group, markedly (P < 0.05) with synbiotic SYN2. Meat from SYN1 birds displayed a higher (P < 0.01) content of saturated fatty acids (SFA), lower monounsaturated fatty acids (P < 0.05 compared only to SYN2), and lower (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), n-6 PUFA and n-3 PUFA compared to C and SYN2 groups. The ratio of n-6 to n-3 PUFA was affected by the synbiotic administration (P = 0.039). Meat from C and SYN2 groups displayed a higher (P < 0.01) ratio of PUFA to SFA and lower (P < 0.01) atherogenic and thrombogenic indices compared to SYN1. In conclusion, this study has shown that in ovo administration of synbiotics did not negatively affect slaughter performance and physicochemical properties of meat. However, meat from C and SYN2 birds showed a preferable fatty acid profile, with a positive effect on nutritional properties of chicken meat.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Synbiotics / Meat Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Poult Sci Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Synbiotics / Meat Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Poult Sci Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Italia