Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Algorithm for Management of Periprosthetic Ankle Fractures.
Lazarides, Alexander L; Vovos, Tyler J; Reddy, Gireesh B; DeOrio, James K; Easley, Mark E; Nunley, James A; Adams, Samuel B.
Affiliation
  • Lazarides AL; 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Vovos TJ; 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Reddy GB; 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • DeOrio JK; 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Easley ME; 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Nunley JA; 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Adams SB; 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Foot Ankle Int ; 40(6): 615-621, 2019 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30813821
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evidence on the management of and outcomes from periprosthetic fractures about a total ankle replacement (TAR) are limited. The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm for the management of patients with postoperative periprosthetic fractures about a TAR.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing a TAR from 2007 through 2017 with a subsequent periprosthetic fracture >4 weeks from index surgery. Implant stability was defined radiographically and intraoperatively where appropriate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify differences in outcomes. Thirty-two patients were identified with a remote TAR periprosthetic fracture with an average follow-up of 26 months (range, 3-104 months).

RESULTS:

Most fractures were located about the medial malleolus (62.5%); the majority of fractures (75%) were deemed to have stable implants. Fractures of the talus always had unstable implants and always required revision TAR surgery (100%, P = .0002). There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes between stable and unstable fractures at an average of 36 months. In a multivariate analysis, fracture location (talus), less time to fracture, and implant type were found to be predictive of unstable implants ( P < .001). Implant stability was independently associated with the need for revision surgery ( P < .049). Nonoperative treatment was independently associated with treatment failure ( P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

The majority of stable fractures about a TAR required operative fixation. Management with immobilization was fraught with a high rate of subsequent surgical intervention. We found that fractures about the talus required revision TAR surgery or arthrodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Periprosthetic Fractures / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle / Ankle Fractures / Fracture Fixation, Internal / Joint Instability Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Foot Ankle Int Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Periprosthetic Fractures / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle / Ankle Fractures / Fracture Fixation, Internal / Joint Instability Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Foot Ankle Int Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos