Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lateral transperitoneal versus posterior retroperitoneal approach - prospective randomized trial.
Kozlowski, Tomasz; Choromanska, Barbara; Wojskowicz, Piotr; Astapczyk, Kamil; Lukaszewicz, Jerzy; Rutkowski, Dominika; Dadan, Jacek; Rydzewska-Rosolowska, Alicja; Mysliwiec, Piotr.
Affiliation
  • Kozlowski T; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Choromanska B; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Wojskowicz P; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Astapczyk K; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Lukaszewicz J; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Rutkowski D; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Dadan J; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Rydzewska-Rosolowska A; 2 Department of Nephrology and Hypertension with Dialysis Unit, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Mysliwiec P; 1 Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne ; 14(2): 160-169, 2019 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31118978
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard of surgical treatment for benign adrenal masses. Two alternative surgical approaches are currently advocated the lateral transperitoneal approach (LTA) and the posterior retroperitoneal approach (PRA). Several randomized trials have compared LTA to PRA, but most of them included small numbers of patients or had stringent inclusion criteria.

AIM:

To compare clinical results of LTA and PRA endoscopic adrenalectomies for tumors < 8 cm with wide inclusion criteria. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We randomized 77 patients to either LTA (n = 33) or PRA (n = 44). The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender proportions, body mass index, tumor size, clinical and pathological diagnosis. We analyzed duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS:

The follow-up concerned 98.8% of patients and was on average 28 (8-47) months long. There were no conversions. We identified significantly lower intensity of pain assessed 24 h after surgery in the PRA group (3.4 ±1), as compared to LTA (4.2 ±1), with lower prevalence of shoulder pain (2.3% vs. 30.3%, respectively). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the PRA (1.14 ±0.4) than in the LTA (1.36 ±0.5) group. Perioperative morbidity concerned 4 patients in each group with pain requiring oral analgesia > 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS:

To our knowledge this is the largest prospective randomized study comparing LTA to PRA. We demonstrated safety, efficacy and very low morbidity of both techniques. The PRA proved superior to LTA in terms of lower intensity of postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Polonia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Polonia