Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TECLA-an innovative technical approach for prostate cancer registries.
Christiansen, Ola; Bratt, Ola; Haug, Erik Skaaheim; Vaktskjold, Arild; Selnes, Anders; Jordhøy, Marit.
Affiliation
  • Christiansen O; Department of Urology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Hamar, Norway.
  • Bratt O; The Research Center for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.
  • Haug ES; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Vaktskjold A; Department of Urology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Toensberg, Norway.
  • Selnes A; INN University, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Elverum, Norway.
  • Jordhøy M; Department of Urology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Hamar, Norway.
Scand J Urol ; 53(4): 229-234, 2019 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264501
Objective: To present a code-driven, electronic database for patients TrEated with robotic-assisted radiCaL prostAtectomy (TECLA), developed at Innlandet Hospital (IH), Trust, Norway, for research, local quality control and to deliver data to the National Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN). Clinical data are directly extracted from the structured documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR).Materials and methods: The urological department at IH treats about 200 patients with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) annually. All consenting patients registered with the procedure code for RARP are included in TECLA. Clinical data are obtained automatically from the EMR, by structured forms. Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) are filled in by the patients on an iPad or a smartphone.Results: The basic construct of TECLA is presented. From August 2017 to June 2018, 200 men were treated with RARP, of which 182 (91%) provided consent for inclusion in the register. Of these, 97% completed the PROM survey before treatment and 91% at 3 months follow-up. PREMs were completed by 78%. All clinical variables for the hospital stay and for the 6-week follow-up were more than 95% complete.Conclusion: This entirely electronic surgical quality register is easy to use, both for patients and clinicians, and has a high capture rate. The data collection is linked to the clinicians' workflow, without double data entry, so entering data does not add any extra work. The register design can be used by other hospitals for various surgical procedures.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Quality of Health Care / Registries / Patient Satisfaction / Robotic Surgical Procedures / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Type of study: Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Scand J Urol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Noruega Country of publication: Suecia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatectomy / Prostatic Neoplasms / Quality of Health Care / Registries / Patient Satisfaction / Robotic Surgical Procedures / Patient Reported Outcome Measures Type of study: Qualitative_research Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Scand J Urol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Noruega Country of publication: Suecia