Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Launonen, Antti P; Sumrein, Bakir O; Reito, Aleksi; Lepola, Vesa; Paloneva, Juha; Jonsson, Kenneth B; Wolf, Olof; Ström, Peter; Berg, Hans E; Felländer-Tsai, Li; Jansson, Karl-Åke; Fell, Daniel; Mechlenburg, Inger; Døssing, Kaj; Østergaard, Helle; Märtson, Aare; Laitinen, Minna K; Mattila, Ville M.
Affiliation
  • Launonen AP; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Sumrein BO; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Reito A; Department of Orthopaedics, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Lepola V; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Paloneva J; Department of Orthopaedics, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Jonsson KB; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Wolf O; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Ström P; Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Berg HE; Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Felländer-Tsai L; Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
  • Jansson KÅ; Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Fell D; Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
  • Mechlenburg I; Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Døssing K; Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
  • Østergaard H; Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Märtson A; Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
  • Laitinen MK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Mattila VM; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
PLoS Med ; 16(7): e1002855, 2019 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31318863
BACKGROUND: Although increasingly used, the benefit of surgical treatment of displaced 2-part proximal humerus fractures has not been proven. This trial evaluates the clinical effectiveness of surgery with locking plate compared with non-operative treatment for these fractures. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The NITEP group conducted a superiority, assessor-blinded, multicenter randomized trial in 6 hospitals in Finland, Estonia, Sweden, and Denmark. Eighty-eight patients aged 60 years or older with displaced (more than 1 cm or 45 degrees) 2-part surgical or anatomical neck proximal humerus fracture were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either operative treatment with a locking plate or non-operative treatment. The mean age of patients was 72 years in the non-operative group and 73 years in the operative group, with a female sex distribution of 95% and 87%, respectively. Patients were recruited between February 2011 and April 2016. The primary outcome measure was Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included Constant-Murley score, the visual analogue scale for pain, the quality of life questionnaire 15D, EuroQol Group's 5-dimension self-reported questionnaire EQ-5D, the Oxford Shoulder Score, and complications. The mean DASH score (0 best, 100 worst) at 2 years was 18.5 points for the operative treatment group and 17.4 points for the non-operative group (mean difference 1.1 [95% CI -7.8 to 9.4], p = 0.81). At 2 years, there were no statistically or clinically significant between-group differences in any of the outcome measures. All 3 complications resulting in secondary surgery occurred in the operative group. The lack of blinding in patient-reported outcome assessment is a limitation of the study. Our assessor physiotherapists were, however, blinded. CONCLUSIONS: This trial found no significant difference in clinical outcomes at 2 years between surgery and non-operative treatment in patients 60 years of age or older with displaced 2-part fractures of the proximal humerus. These results suggest that the current practice of performing surgery on the majority of displaced proximal 2-part fractures of the humerus in older adults may not be beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01246167.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shoulder Fractures / Physical Therapy Modalities / Fracture Healing / Fracture Fixation / Fracture Fixation, Internal Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: PLoS Med Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Finlandia Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shoulder Fractures / Physical Therapy Modalities / Fracture Healing / Fracture Fixation / Fracture Fixation, Internal Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: PLoS Med Journal subject: MEDICINA Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Finlandia Country of publication: Estados Unidos