Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Quarter of Participants With Advanced Neoplasia Have Discordant Results From 2-Sample Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Wieten, Els; de Klerk, Clasine M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris; Bossuyt, Patrick M; Dekker, Evelien; Spaander, Manon C W.
Affiliation
  • Wieten E; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Klerk CM; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bossuyt PM; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dekker E; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Spaander MCW; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: v.spaander@erasmusmc.nl.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(8): 1805-1811.e1, 2020 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563557
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Some colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs use 2-sample fecal immunochemical tests (FITs). We aimed to assess advanced neoplasia (AN) yield of 2 different FIT assays performed on the same bowel movement and have discordant results.

METHODS:

We conducted a large prospective comparative accuracy study within the Dutch national CRC screening program to evaluate 2 quantitative FIT assays (FOB-Gold, Sentinel, Italy and OC-Sensor, Eiken, Japan) with comparable performance characteristics. We asked 42,179 screening-naïve individuals, 55-75 years old, to perform both tests on the same bowel movement, from May 2016 through March 2017. Participants with ≥1 positive test result (≥15 µg hemoglobin/gram feces) were invited for colonoscopy examination. Detection of AN by colonoscopy was the reference standard.

RESULTS:

A total of 21,078 participants (50% participation rate) were included. FIT results were both negative for 19,032 participants (90%), both positive for 1163 participants (5.5%), and discordant for 883 participants (4.2%). AN was detected in 500 participants with 2 positive FIT results (43%) compared to 187 with discordant FIT results (21%) (p < .001). Of the 687 participants found to have AN by colonoscopy, 187 had only 1 positive FIT result (27%).

CONCLUSION:

In a large 2-sample FIT-based CRC screening study, more than a quarter of participants in whom AN was detected by colonoscopy in the first screening round had discordant FIT results. AN was detected in one-fifth of those with FIT discordance. Participants with discordant results from 2 FITs should undergo colonoscopy. (www.trialregister.nl; no. NTR5874).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Early Detection of Cancer Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Países Bajos