Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards a Maturity Model for Clinical Decision Support Operations.
Orenstein, Evan W; Muthu, Naveen; Weitkamp, Asli O; Ferro, Daria F; Zeidlhack, Mike D; Slagle, Jason; Shelov, Eric; Tobias, Marc C.
Affiliation
  • Orenstein EW; Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
  • Muthu N; Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, United States.
  • Weitkamp AO; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Ferro DF; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Zeidlhack MD; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
  • Slagle J; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Shelov E; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
  • Tobias MC; Phrase Health Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Appl Clin Inform ; 10(5): 810-819, 2019 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31667818
ABSTRACT
Clinical decision support (CDS) systems delivered through the electronic health record are an important element of quality and safety initiatives within a health care system. However, managing a large CDS knowledge base can be an overwhelming task for informatics teams. Additionally, it can be difficult for these informatics teams to communicate their goals with external operational stakeholders and define concrete steps for improvement. We aimed to develop a maturity model that describes a roadmap toward organizational functions and processes that help health care systems use CDS more effectively to drive better outcomes. We developed a maturity model for CDS operations through discussions with health care leaders at 80 organizations, iterative model development by four clinical informaticists, and subsequent review with 19 health care organizations. We ceased iterations when feedback from three organizations did not result in any changes to the model. The proposed CDS maturity model includes three main "pillars" "Content Creation," "Analytics and Reporting," and "Governance and Management." Each pillar contains five levels-advancing along each pillar provides CDS teams a deeper understanding of the processes CDS systems are intended to improve. A "roof" represents the CDS functions that become attainable after advancing along each of the pillars. Organizations are not required to advance in order and can develop in one pillar separately from another. However, we hypothesize that optimal deployment of preceding levels and advancing in tandem along the pillars increase the value of organizational investment in higher levels of CDS maturity. In addition to describing the maturity model and its development, we also provide three case studies of health care organizations using the model for self-assessment and determine next steps in CDS development.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Support Systems, Clinical Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Appl Clin Inform Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Decision Support Systems, Clinical Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Appl Clin Inform Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos