Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes based on blood pressure in patients on continuous flow left ventricular assist device support: An Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support analysis.
Cowger, Jennifer A; Shah, Palak; Pagani, Francis D; Grafton, Gillan; Stulak, John; Chamogeorgakis, Themistokles; Lanfear, David; Nemeh, Hassan; Pinney, Sean.
Affiliation
  • Cowger JA; Henry Ford Hospitals, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: jcowger1@hfhs.org.
  • Shah P; Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Pagani FD; University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Grafton G; Henry Ford Hospitals, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Stulak J; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Chamogeorgakis T; Henry Ford Hospitals, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Lanfear D; Henry Ford Hospitals, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Nemeh H; Henry Ford Hospitals, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Pinney S; Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York City, New York.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 39(5): 441-453, 2020 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31831209
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An optimal blood pressure (BP) range to mitigate morbidity and mortality on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support has not been clearly defined.

METHODS:

Average Doppler opening pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and/or systolic blood pressure (SBP) were calculated in operative survivors (n = 16,155) of LVAD support in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS). BP distributions were used to group patients into low (BP <25th percentile), normal (25-75th percentile), high (75th-95th percentile), and very high (>95th percentile). Associations between BP and adverse events were evaluated using Cox regression (hazard ratio[HR], 95% confidence interval).

RESULTS:

The median (25th, 75th) MAP, Doppler, and SBP (mm Hg) during continuous flow LVAD support were 84 (77, 90), 85 (80, 92), and 99 (90, 107) mm Hg, respectively. BP had a bimodal risk association with survival. At 3 years, survival was 58% ± 1.8% in those with low MAP (≤75 mm Hg) vs 70% ± 0.9%, 71% ± 1.5%, and 63% ± 3.0% in the those with normal, high, or very high average MAP, respectively. Patients with chronically low MAP (≤75 mm Hg), Doppler (≤80 mm Hg), and SBP (<90 mm Hg) had 35%-42% higher adjusted hazards of death than patients with normal or high BP (p ≤ 0.0001). Patients with MAP >100 mm Hg, Doppler ≥105 mm Hg, and SBP ≥120 mm Hg had 17%-20% higher adjusted hazards of death than those with normal pressures (p < 0.05). In patients on axial flow LVADs, elevated SBP (HR 1.08 [95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13] per 10 mm Hg increase) but not MAP correlated with increased incident of stroke.

CONCLUSIONS:

In INTERMACS, BP extremes during LVAD support increase the risk for adverse events, supporting a MAP goal >75 mm Hg and <90 mm Hg. Hypotension conferred the highest risk for mortality. Excessive BP control should be avoided, and Doppler opening pressure should not be assumed to represent MAP in all patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Pressure / Blood Pressure Determination / Registries / Heart-Assist Devices / Heart Failure / Heart Ventricles Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Year: 2020 Document type: Article Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Pressure / Blood Pressure Determination / Registries / Heart-Assist Devices / Heart Failure / Heart Ventricles Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Year: 2020 Document type: Article Publication country: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA