Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heart rate score predicts mortality independent of shocks in ICD and CRT-D patients.
Olshansky, Brian; Richards, Mark; Sharma, Arjun D; Jones, Paul W; Wold, Nick; Perschbacher, David; Wilkoff, Bruce L.
Affiliation
  • Olshansky B; Mercy Hospital- North Iowa, Mason City, IA, USA. brian-olshansky@uiowa.edu.
  • Richards M; University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Room 4426A JCP, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. brian-olshansky@uiowa.edu.
  • Sharma AD; Promedica Physicians Cardiology, Toledo, OH, USA.
  • Jones PW; Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  • Wold N; Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  • Perschbacher D; Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  • Wilkoff BL; Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 58(1): 103-111, 2020 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31875270
BACKGROUND: Heart Rate Score (HrSc), a novel index found to predict mortality in patients with implantable defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) devices, is associated with mortality in ICD and CRT-D recipients when HrSc is ≥ 70%. Implantable defibrillator shocks have also been associated with increased mortality in ICD and CRT-D recipients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationships between HrSc, shocks, and mortality in ICD and CRT-D patients. METHODS: HrSc was calculated from atrial sensed and paced rate histograms collected from the 2006-2011 ALTITUDE remote interrogation database. Shocks were determined in the first year of follow-up. Mortality was assessed over the next 4 years by the Social Security Death Index. Four multivariable models were run: ICD and CRT-D, shock and no shock, with mortality as the outcome and HrS as predictor. RESULTS: Data from 49,358 ICD and 55,953 CRT-D patients were divided into HrSc: ≥ 70%, 30-69%, and < 30%. Shock rates differed between HrSc groups (p < 0.001) for ICD and CRT-D patients. However, the lowest mortality risk HrSc (< 30%) had the highest shock rate. Both highest HrSc (> 70%; p < 0.001) and shocks (p < 0.001) predicted mortality during follow-up. Mortality was unrelated to interactions between HrSc and shocks in ICD patients (p = 0.275) or CRT-D patients (p < 0.079). Comparing HrSc ≥ 70% to HrSc < 30%, HrSc ≥ 70% predicted mortality in CRT-D (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.29-1.52) and ICD (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.11-1.36) patients regardless of shocks (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICDs or CRT-Ds having the lowest mortality risk HrSc had the highest shock rate. Shocks and HrSc appear to complement each other as predictors of mortality.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Defibrillators, Implantable / Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy / Heart Failure Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Países Bajos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Defibrillators, Implantable / Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy / Heart Failure Type of study: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Países Bajos