Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical Evaluation and Strength Test of 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses.
Lin, Kuang-Wei; Hu, Chia-Jung; Yang, Wen-Wen; Chou, Li-Wei; Wei, Shun-Hwa; Chen, Chen-Sheng; Sun, Pi-Chang.
Affiliation
  • Lin KW; Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Hu CJ; Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Yang WW; Department of Sports Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chou LW; Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Wei SH; Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chen CS; Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Sun PC; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Appl Bionics Biomech ; 2019: 4989534, 2019.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31885687
ABSTRACT
Foot orthoses (FOs) are commonly used as interventions for individuals with flatfoot. Advances in technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and 3D printing have facilitated the fabrication of custom FOs. However, few studies have been conducted on the mechanical properties and biomechanical effects of 3D-printed FOs. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3D-printed FOs and determine their biomechanical effects in individuals with flexible flatfoot. During mechanical testing, a total of 18 FO samples with three orientations (0°, 45°, and 90°) were fabricated and tested. The maximum compressive load and stiffness were calculated. During a motion capture experiment, 12 individuals with flatfoot were enrolled, and the 3D-printed FOs were used as interventions. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during walking by using an optical motion capture system. A one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the mechanical parameters among the three build orientations. A paired t-test was conducted to compare the biomechanical variables under two conditions walking in standard shoes (Shoe) and walking in shoes embedded with FOs (Shoe+FO). The results indicated that the 45° build orientation produced the strongest FOs. In addition, the maximum ankle evertor and external rotator moments under the Shoe+FO condition were significantly reduced by 35% and 16%, respectively, but the maximum ankle plantar flexor moments increased by 3%, compared with the Shoe condition. No significant difference in ground reaction force was observed between the two conditions. This study demonstrated that 3D-printed FOs could alter the ankle joint moments during gait.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech Year: 2019 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán