Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) Responsive Parenting Intervention for Firstborns Affects Dietary Intake of Secondborn Infants.
Hohman, Emily E; Savage, Jennifer S; Birch, Leann L; Paul, Ian M.
Affiliation
  • Hohman EE; Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  • Savage JS; Center for Childhood Obesity Research, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  • Birch LL; Department of Nutritional Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
  • Paul IM; Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
J Nutr ; 150(8): 2139-2146, 2020 08 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32412629
BACKGROUND: Although previous work has shown that children with older siblings tend to have poorer diet quality, no study has directly compared diets of infant siblings. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this analysis were to examine birth-order differences in dietary intake between firstborn (FB) and secondborn (SB) siblings, and to determine whether a responsive parenting (RP) intervention modified birth-order effects on diet. METHODS: The Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT) study randomly assigned first-time mothers to an RP intervention, which included guidance on feeding, sleep, soothing, and interactive play, or control. INSIGHT mothers who delivered a second child enrolled in an observation-only study of their SB infant (SIBSIGHT). Mothers completed FFQs for both children at ages 6 (n = 97 sibling pairs) and 12 (n = 100) mo. FB compared with SB intake of food groups of interest were compared, and the moderating effect of the RP intervention on birth-order differences was tested using generalized linear mixed models. RESULTS: Though FBs and SBs had similar diets, more FBs than SBs consumed 100% fruit juice at both 6 (13.8 compared with 3.2%, P = 0.006) and 12 mo (46.0 compared with 32.0%, P = 0.01). SBs consumed fruit more frequently (FB 2.8 compared with SB 3.2 times/d, P = 0.01), and were more likely to consume fried potatoes (FB 38.4 compared with SB 57.6%, P = 0.0009) and processed meats (FB 43.0 compared with SB 58.0%, P = 0.02) than FBs at 12 mo. There were no differences by birth order in intake of sweets, snacks, or sugar-sweetened beverages at 12 mo. At 12 mo, RP-group SBs ate vegetables more times per day (3.2) than control SBs (2.2, P = 0.01). RP-SBs also consumed a greater variety of vegetables (10.2) than control-SBs (7.9, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Birth order is not consistently associated with healthy or unhealthy infant dietary intake. However, an RP intervention delivered to first-time mothers may benefit subsequent infants' vegetable intake. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01167270.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Birth Order / Parenting / Education, Nonprofessional / Diet, Healthy / Mother-Child Relations Limits: Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: J Nutr Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Birth Order / Parenting / Education, Nonprofessional / Diet, Healthy / Mother-Child Relations Limits: Adult / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: J Nutr Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos Country of publication: Estados Unidos