Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tenecteplase versus alteplase after acute ischemic stroke at high age.
Thommessen, Bente; Næss, Halvor; Logallo, Nicola; Kvistad, Christopher E; Waje-Andreassen, Ulrike; Ihle-Hansen, Hege; Ihle-Hansen, Håkon; Thomassen, Lars; Morten Rønning, Ole.
Affiliation
  • Thommessen B; Department of Neurology, Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.
  • Næss H; Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Logallo N; Center for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Kvistad CE; Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Waje-Andreassen U; Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Ihle-Hansen H; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Ihle-Hansen H; Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Thomassen L; Department of Internal Medicine, Bærum Hospital, Drammen, Norway.
  • Morten Rønning O; Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Int J Stroke ; 16(3): 295-299, 2021 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631157
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stroke prevalence is increasing with age. Alteplase is the only agent approved for thrombolytic treatment for patients with ischemic stroke, including patients ≥80 years. In the present study, the aim was to compare efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and alteplase in patients ≥80 years.

METHODS:

Data from the Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing alteplase and tenecteplase, were assessed.

RESULTS:

Of the 273 patients ≥80 years included, mean age was 85.5 years.In the intention-to-treat analyses, 43.1% receiving tenecteplase and 39.9% receiving alteplase reached excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) after 3 months (odds ratio (OR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.85, p=0.59). No significant differences among patients in the two treatment groups regarding frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage during the first 48 h were identified (11 (8.5%) in the tenecteplase group, 10 (7.0%) in the alteplase group, OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.50-3.00, p 0.65). Death within 3 months occurred in 18 patients (14.3%) in the tenecteplase group and in 21 (15.3%) in the alteplase group (p 0.84). After excluding stroke mimics, the proportion of patients with excellent functional outcome was 44.1% in the tenecteplase group and 34.4% in the alteplase group (OR 1.50 CI 0.90-2.52, p 0.12).

CONCLUSION:

No differences in the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients ≥80 years were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01949948).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Ischemia / Stroke / Ischemic Stroke Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged80 / Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Stroke Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Noruega

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Ischemia / Stroke / Ischemic Stroke Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged80 / Humans Language: En Journal: Int J Stroke Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Noruega