Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sedative drugs modulate the neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus of parkinsonian patients.
Benady, Amit; Zadik, Sean; Eimerl, Dan; Heymann, Sami; Bergman, Hagai; Israel, Zvi; Raz, Aeyal.
Affiliation
  • Benady A; St George's University of London Medical School, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Zadik S; Center of Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Eimerl D; St George's University of London Medical School, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
  • Heymann S; Department of Anesthesia, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Bergman H; Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Israel Z; Department of Medical Neurobiology, Hebrew University - Hadassah Medical Scholl, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Raz A; Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 14536, 2020 09 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32884017
ABSTRACT
Microelectrode recording (MER) is often used to identify electrode location which is critical for the success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment of Parkinson's disease. The usage of anesthesia and its' impact on MER quality and electrode placement is controversial. We recorded neuronal activity at a single depth inside the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) before, during, and after remifentanil infusion. The root mean square (RMS) of the 250-6000 Hz band-passed signal was used to evaluate the regional spiking activity, the power spectrum to evaluate the oscillatory activity and the coherence to evaluate synchrony between two microelectrodes. We compare those to new frequency domain (spectral) analysis of previously obtained data during propofol sedation. Results showed Remifentanil decreased the normalized RMS by 9% (P < 0.001), a smaller decrease compared to propofol. Regarding the beta range oscillatory activity, remifentanil depressed oscillations (drop from 25 to 5% of oscillatory electrodes), while propofol did not (increase from 33.3 to 41.7% of oscillatory electrodes). In the cases of simultaneously recorded oscillatory electrodes, propofol did not change the synchronization while remifentanil depressed it. In conclusion, remifentanil interferes with the identification of the dorsolateral oscillatory region, whereas propofol interferes with RMS identification of the STN borders. Thus, both have undesired effect during the MER procedure.Trial registration NCT00355927 and NCT00588926.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parkinson Disease / Subthalamic Nucleus / Hypnotics and Sedatives / Microelectrodes / Neurons Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Israel Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Parkinson Disease / Subthalamic Nucleus / Hypnotics and Sedatives / Microelectrodes / Neurons Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Israel Publication country: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM