Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of using a PORP to reconstruct the ossicular chain under otoendoscopy with and without a malleus handle.
Zhang, Min; Chen, Xiaoyun; Huang, Yideng; Yang, Zifei; Zhang, Yue; Wu, Xianmin.
Affiliation
  • Zhang M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Chen X; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Huang Y; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Yang Z; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • Wu X; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 141(1): 19-22, 2021 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33063573
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There are many reports on the role of the malleus handle in ossicular chain reconstruction (OCR). However, the effect of the presence of the malleus handle is not clear. AIM/

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the hearing outcomes of using a partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) to reconstruct the ossicular chain under otoendoscopy with and without a malleus handle.

METHODS:

Records of 57 patients requiring OCR were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the malleus handle-present group (group 1) and the malleus handle-absent group (group 2). The audiometric results were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. A postoperative air-bone gap (ABG)≤20 dB was considered successful.

RESULTS:

The mean improvement in air conduction hearing thresholds was 19.80 dB in group 1 and 16.70 dB in group 2. The mean ABG improvement was 18.09 ± 12.79 dB for group 1 and 17.20 ± 16.44 dB for group 2. The malleus handle-present group achieved higher success (65.63%) than the malleus handle-absent group (52%; p> .05). CONCLUSIONS AND

SIGNIFICANCE:

Improvements in hearing outcomes were similar for the two groups. However, the malleus handle-present group showed a better reconstruction success rate. Our results suggest that if there is no lesion in the malleus handle, it is recommended to be retained.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tympanoplasty / Bone Conduction / Ossicular Prosthesis / Ossicular Replacement / Ear Ossicles / Hearing Loss Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tympanoplasty / Bone Conduction / Ossicular Prosthesis / Ossicular Replacement / Ear Ossicles / Hearing Loss Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China