Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Verification system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy with scintillator.
Ando, Yasuharu; Miki, Kentaro; Araki, Jun; Tsuneda, Masato; Kiriu, Hiroshi; Nishio, Teiji; Nagata, Yasushi.
Affiliation
  • Ando Y; Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. ibanez-gravity@hotmail.co.jp.
  • Miki K; Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Araki J; Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Tsuneda M; Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kiriu H; Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Nishio T; Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagata Y; Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Phys Eng Sci Med ; 44(1): 9-21, 2021 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33206366
In the preparation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), patient-specific verification is widely employed to optimize the treatment. To accurately estimate the accumulated dose and obtain the field-by-field or segment-by-segment verification, an original IMRT verification tool using scintillator light and an analysis workflow was developed in this study. The raw light distribution was calibrated with respect to the irradiated field size dependency and light diffusion in the water. The calibrated distribution was converted to dose quantity and subsequently compared with the results of the clinically employed plan. A criterion of 2-mm dose-to-agreement and 3% dose difference was specified in the gamma analysis with a 10% dose threshold. By applying the light diffusion calibration, the maximum dose difference was corrected from 7.7 cGy to 3.9 cGy around the field edge for a 60 cGy dose, 7 × 7 cm2 irradiation field, and 10 MV beam energy. Equivalent performance was confirmed in the chromodynamic film. The average dose difference and gamma pass rate of the accumulated dose distributions in six patients were 0.8 ± 4.5 cGy and 97.4%, respectively. In the field-by-field analysis, the average dose difference and gamma pass rate in seven fields of Patient 1 were 0.2 ± 1.2 cGy and 93.9%, respectively. In the segment-by-segment analysis, the average dose difference and gamma pass rate in nine segments of Patient 1 and a 305° gantry angle were - 0.03 ± 0.2 cGy and 93.9%, respectively. This system allowed the simultaneous and independent analysis of each field or segment in the accumulated dose analysis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Phys Eng Sci Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japón Country of publication: Suiza

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Phys Eng Sci Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Japón Country of publication: Suiza