Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Genotype Signature for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Xiao, Wei-Wei; Li, Min; Guo, Zhi-Wei; Zhang, Rong; Xi, Shao-Yan; Zhang, Xiang-Guo; Li, Yong; Wu, De-Qing; Ren, Yu-Feng; Pang, Xiao-Lin; Wan, Xiang-Bo; Li, Kun; Zhou, Chun-Lian; Zhai, Xiang-Ming; Liang, Zhi-Kun; Wang, Qiao-Xuan; Zeng, Zhi-Fan; Zhang, Hui-Zhong; Yang, Xue-Xi; Wu, Ying-Song; Li, Ming; Gao, Yuan-Hong.
Affiliation
  • Xiao WW; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co, Ltd High-Tech Development Zone, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Key Laboratory of Antibody Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Laboratory Me
  • Guo ZW; Key Laboratory of Antibody Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang R; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Xi SY; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang XG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Yuebei People Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, ShaoGuan, Guangdong, China.
  • Li Y; Department of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Wu DQ; Department of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Ren YF; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Pang XL; Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Wan XB; Department of Radiation Oncology, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li K; Key Laboratory of Antibody Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhou CL; Key Laboratory of Antibody Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhai XM; Key Laboratory of Antibody Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Liang ZK; Guangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co, Ltd High-Tech Development Zone, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Wang QX; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zeng ZF; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang HZ; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Yang XX; Guangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co, Ltd High-Tech Development Zone, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Key Laboratory of Antibody Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Wu YS; Guangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co, Ltd High-Tech Development Zone, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Key Laboratory of Antibody Engineering of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Li M; Guangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co, Ltd High-Tech Development Zone, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
  • Gao YH; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Electronic address: gaoyh@sysu
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 110(2): 482-491, 2021 06 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33434612
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To construct and validate a predicting genotype signature for pathologic complete response (pCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer (PGS-LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Whole exome sequencing was performed in 15 LARC tissues. Mutation sites were selected according to the whole exome sequencing data and literature. Target sequencing was performed in a training cohort (n = 202) to build the PGS-LARC model using regression analysis, and internal (n = 76) and external validation cohorts (n = 69) were used for validating the results. Predictive performance of the PGS-LARC model was compared with clinical factors and between subgroups. The PGS-LARC model comprised 15 genes.

RESULTS:

The area under the curve (AUC) of the PGS model in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts was 0.776 (0.697-0.849), 0.760 (0.644-0.867), and 0.812 (0.690-0.915), respectively, and demonstrated higher AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity than cT stage, cN stage, carcinoembryonic antigen level, and CA19-9 level for pCR prediction. The predictive performance of the model was superior to clinical factors in all subgroups. For patients with clinical complete response (cCR), the positive prediction value was 94.7%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The PGS-LARC is a reliable predictive tool for pCR in patients with LARC and might be helpful to enable nonoperative management strategy in those patients who refuse surgery. It has the potential to guide treatment decisions for patients with different probability of tumor regression after neoadjuvant therapy, especially when combining cCR criteria and PGS-LARC.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant / Transcriptome / Genotype Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rectal Neoplasms / Neoadjuvant Therapy / Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant / Transcriptome / Genotype Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China