Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The critical difference in the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) outcome measure after essential upper extremity tumor surgery.
Ogura, Koichi; Yakoub, Mohamed A; Christ, Alexander B; Fujiwara, Tomohiro; Nikolic, Zarko; Boland, Patrick J; Athanasian, Edward A; Healey, John H.
Affiliation
  • Ogura K; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Yakoub MA; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Christ AB; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Fujiwara T; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Nikolic Z; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Boland PJ; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Athanasian EA; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Healey JH; Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: healeyj@mskcc.org.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 30(9): e602-e609, 2021 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484830
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) is a scored questionnaire that is widely used to evaluate the health-related quality of life of patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. However, numerical changes in the measure scores lack clinical significance without meaningful threshold change values of outcome measures that are diagnostically specific. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is useful for the interpretation of scores by defining the smallest change that a patient would perceive. However, the MCIDs of the scores in orthopedic oncology patients has not been reported. We aimed to determine the MCIDs of the measure in orthopedic oncology patients.

METHODS:

Data from our health-related quality of life database from 1999 to 2005 were retrospectively reviewed after institutional review board approval. Seventy-eight patients who underwent surgery and completed 2 surveys during postoperative follow-up were evaluated. Two different methods were used to estimate the MCIDs distribution-based and anchor-based approaches (the latter used receiver operating characteristic analysis).

RESULTS:

Using distribution-based methods, the MCIDs of the DASH questionnaire were 7.4 and 8.3 by half standard deviation and the 90% interval of minimal detectable change, respectively. By anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic analysis), the MCID was 8.3.

CONCLUSION:

The MCID values calculated by each method validates that the results for upper extremity oncology patients were similar to those reported in other orthopedic conditions. These results identify the threshold for meaningful improvements in DASH scores in orthopedic oncology patients and establish the reference to evaluate health-related quality of life and the outcomes of upper extremity oncology surgery. These data should be further refined for disease- and reconstruction-specific analyses.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Shoulder Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Shoulder Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos
...