Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcomes and uroflowmetry assessment in patients with apical prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension.
Ma, Yidi; Zhang, Ye; Ma, Congcong; Wang, Yuan; Tian, Weijie; Zhu, Lan.
Affiliation
  • Ma Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Ma C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Tian W; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Zhu L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhu_julie@vip.sina.com.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 259: 12-17, 2021 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550106
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim was to evaluate the voiding function and voiding dysfunction 3 months after laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS). We identified risk factors for postoperative voiding dysfunction. STUDY

DESIGN:

This retrospective study included 57 women with apical prolapse who underwent LUSLS with stage II or greater apical prolapse and without advanced anterior vaginal prolapse (stage III or IV). Data were collected from electronic medical records. Voiding function was assessed by uroflowmetry, PVR examination, and self-report questionnaires (the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and the Urinary Impact Questionnaire) at baseline and 3 months after surgery. Voiding dysfunction was defined as an average flow rate (Qave)<10 ml/s, a maximum flow rate (Qmax)<15 ml/s, or a postvoid residual volume (PVR)>50 ml. Statistical analyses were performed using paired-sample t tests, χ2 tests, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS:

Thirty-five percent of women suffered from voiding dysfunction preoperatively. Uroflowmetry parameters and PVR, objective symptoms including voiding difficulties, incomplete empty, frequency and urinary incontinence didn't show significant improvement postoperatively (all p>0.05). Low Qave was identified as an independent risk factor of post voiding dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.558; 95 % CI, 0.324-0.963).

CONCLUSIONS:

Approximately one-third of women suffering from apical prolapse without advanced anterior vaginal wall had evidence of voiding dysfunction preoperatively. LUSLS has no obvious effect on uroflowmetry parameters and clinical symptoms.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Prolapse / Laparoscopy / Pelvic Organ Prolapse Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Uterine Prolapse / Laparoscopy / Pelvic Organ Prolapse Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: China