Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of multi-criteria and artificial intelligence models for land-subsidence susceptibility zonation.
Arabameri, Alireza; Chandra Pal, Subodh; Rezaie, Fatemeh; Chakrabortty, Rabin; Chowdhuri, Indrajit; Blaschke, Thomas; Thi Ngo, Phuong Thao.
Affiliation
  • Arabameri A; Department of Geomorphology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14117-13116, Iran. Electronic address: a.arabameri@modares.ac.ir.
  • Chandra Pal S; Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, 713104, India. Electronic address: scpal@geo.buruniv.ac.in.
  • Rezaie F; Geoscience Platform Research Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), 124, Gwahak-ro Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34132, Republic of Korea; Korea University of Science and Technology, 217 Gajeong-roYuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34113, Republic of Korea.
  • Chakrabortty R; Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, 713104, India. Electronic address: rabingeo8@gmail.com.
  • Chowdhuri I; Department of Geography, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, 713104, India. Electronic address: indrajitchowdhuri@gmail.com.
  • Blaschke T; Department of Geoinformatics - Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. Electronic address: thomas.blaschke@sbg.ac.at.
  • Thi Ngo PT; Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Viet Nam. Electronic address: ngotphuongthao5@duytan.edu.vn.
J Environ Manage ; 284: 112067, 2021 Apr 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33556831
Land subsidence (LS) in arid and semi-arid areas, such as Iran, is a significant threat to sustainable land management. The purpose of this study is to predict the LS distribution by generating land subsidence susceptibility models (LSSMs) for the Shahroud plain in Iran using three different multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) and five different artificial intelligence (AI) models. The MCDM models we used are the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija IKompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS), and the AI models are the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Cubist, Elasticnet, Bayesian multivariate adaptive regression spline (BMARS) and conditional random forest (Cforest) methods. We used the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, Area Under Curve (AUC) and different statistical indices,i.e. accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F score, Kappa, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Nash-Sutcliffe Criteria (NSC)to validate and evaluate the methods. Based on the different validation techniques, the Cforest method yielded the best results with minimum and maximum values of 0.04 and 0.99, respectively. According to the Cforest model, 30.55% of the study area is extremely vulnerable to land subsidence. The results of our research will be of great help to planners and policy makers in the identification of the most vulnerable regions and the implementation of appropriate development strategies in this area.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Artificial Intelligence Type of study: Prognostic_studies Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: J Environ Manage Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Artificial Intelligence Type of study: Prognostic_studies Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: J Environ Manage Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: Reino Unido