Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.
Zhu, Wengen; Ye, Zi; Chen, Shilan; Wu, Dexi; He, Jiangui; Dong, Yugang; Lip, Gregory Y H; Liu, Chen.
Affiliation
  • Zhu W; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
  • Ye Z; NHC Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
  • Chen S; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
  • Wu D; NHC Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
  • He J; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
  • Dong Y; NHC Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
  • Lip GYH; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
  • Liu C; NHC Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation (W.Z., Z.Y., S.C., D.W., J.H., Y.D., C.L.), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Stroke ; 52(4): 1225-1233, 2021 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596677
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Several observational studies have compared the effect of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to each other in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, confounding by indication is a major problem when comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments in some of these studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant by only including the propensity score matching studies.

METHODS:

We systematically searched the PubMed and Ovid databases until May 2020 to identify relevant observational studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the reported outcomes were collected and then pooled by a random-effects model complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model.

RESULTS:

A total of 17 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with dabigatran use, the use of rivaroxaban was significantly associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05-1.29]) and major bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.24-1.41]), whereas the use of apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.56-1.28]). Compared with rivaroxaban use, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54-0.73]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.04]). Reanalyses with the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model produced similar results as the random-effects model.

CONCLUSIONS:

Current observational comparisons with propensity score matching methods suggest that apixaban might be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atrial Fibrillation / Thromboembolism / Stroke / Anticoagulants Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Stroke Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atrial Fibrillation / Thromboembolism / Stroke / Anticoagulants Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Stroke Year: 2021 Document type: Article