Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of new technologies in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Application of next-generation sequencing in myelofibrosis.
Navrátilová, Jana; Palová, Miroslava; Szotkowski, Tomás; Hlusí, Antonín; Katrincsáková, Beáta; Papajík, Tomás; Indrák, Karel.
Affiliation
  • Navrátilová J; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Palová M; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Szotkowski T; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Hlusí A; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Katrincsáková B; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Papajík T; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Indrák K; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Int J Lab Hematol ; 43(5): 1070-1077, 2021 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734589
INTRODUCTION: Driver mutations in Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are well known. In the past, whole-genome sequencing identified nondriver mutations in other genes, potentially contributing to evolution of malignant clones. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing was used to assess the presence of any mutations in 14 candidate genes at the point of diagnosis and the resultant impact on the clinical course of the disease. RESULTS: The study analysed 63 patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Nondriver mutations were detected in 44% of them. The most frequently affected genes were ASXL1 (27%), TET2 (11%) and SF3B1 (6%). The frequency of such mutations was highest in primary MF (59%) and lowest in the prefibrotic phase of primary MF (21%). Patients with prognostically unfavourable sequence variants in genes had significantly worse overall survival (53 vs 71 months; HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.17-6.56; P = .017). CONCLUSION: In our study, multivariate analysis proved DIPSS to be the only significant factor to predict patient survival. DIPSS contains all of the important clinical and laboratory factors except genetic changes. Stratification of patients according to DIPSS is still beneficial although there are newer and improved scoring systems like GIPSS or MIPSS70. Assessing subclonal mutations in candidate genes during diagnosis may aid in the identification of high-risk MF patients and is therefore relevant for making a prediction for overall survival more accurate.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Myelofibrosis Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Lab Hematol Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: República Checa Country of publication: Reino Unido

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Primary Myelofibrosis Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Lab Hematol Journal subject: HEMATOLOGIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: República Checa Country of publication: Reino Unido