Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy between conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with two different lens fragmentation patterns.
Lin, Hung-Yuan; Kao, Shu-Ting; Chuang, Ya-Jung; Chen, Shuan; Lin, Pi-Jung.
Affiliation
  • Lin HY; Universal Eye Center, Zhong-Li, Taiwan.
  • Kao ST; Department of Optometry, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chuang YJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Sheng, China.
  • Chen S; Universal Eye Center, Ban-Qiao, Taiwan. ginakao0430@gmail.com.
  • Lin PJ; Universal Eye Center, Long-Tan, Taiwan.
Lasers Med Sci ; 37(2): 843-848, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33876322
ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study is to compare the total ultrasound power used between eyes undergoing different lens fragmentation patterns of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS). A total of 506 patient eyes underwent preoperative grading of lens opacity using the Lens Opacity Classification System III (LOCSIII). The eyes were divided into two subgroups subgroup 1 had a LOCSIII grade of 1-3, and subgroup 2 had a LOCSIII grade of 4-6. The eyes underwent FLACS (LenSx) for clear corneal wound, capsulotomy, and lens fragmentation. Either a grid pattern or radial pattern was used for lens fragmentation. The eyes received one of the following three treatments (1) CPS without femtosecond laser assistant, (2) FLACS with a grid pattern (FGP) lens fragment, or (3) FLACS with a quadrant pattern (FQP) lens fragment. The mean cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) for each subgroup and treatment was evaluated. The mean CDE was lower in the two FLACS groups (1.21±1.91 in FGP and 1.22±1.92 in FQP) than that in the CPG group (2.67±2.84). In subgroup 1, CDE was higher in the CPG group (1.54±1.18) as compared with the FLACS groups (0.16±0.31 in FGP and 0.74±1.17 in FQP; P<0.001). In subgroup 2, CDE was higher in the CPG (6.47±3.46) as compared with the FLACS groups (2.74±2.21 in FGP and 5.34±2.17 in FQP; P<0.001). CDE was lower in the two FLACS groups than that in the CPS group, and CDE was the lowest with FGP in both subgroups 1 and 2.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cataract / Phacoemulsification / Laser Therapy Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Lasers Med Sci Journal subject: BIOTECNOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cataract / Phacoemulsification / Laser Therapy Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Lasers Med Sci Journal subject: BIOTECNOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwán