Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration: Consensus of French experts for first-line treatment selection and the importance of long-term risk/benefit ratio]. / Consensus d'experts français sur les critères de choix d'un traitement de 1re intention dans la DMLA néovasculaire et importance du ratio bénéfice/risque à long terme.
Couturier, A; Kodjikian, L; Baillif, S; Conart, J-B; Dot, C; Delyfer, M-N; Matonti, F; Caillaux, V; Bousquet, E; Robinet, A; Massé, H; Uzzan, J; Mrejen, S; Semoun, O.
Affiliation
  • Couturier A; Université de Paris, service d'ophtalmologie, assistance publique hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
  • Kodjikian L; Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire Croix-Rousse, hospices Civils de Lyon, université Lyon I, Lyon, France; CNRS UMR 5510 Mateis, Villeurbanne, France.
  • Baillif S; Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital universitaire Pasteur 2, université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
  • Conart JB; Service d'ophtalmologie, CHRU Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Institut de la Vision, Inserm, UMR_S 968, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
  • Dot C; Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital d'instruction des Armées Desgenettes, 69003 Lyon, France; École du Val de Grâce, Paris, France.
  • Delyfer MN; Service d'ophtalmologie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, université de Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux population health research centre, team LEHA, UMR 1219, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
  • Matonti F; Centre Monticelli Paradis, Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INT, Inst Neurosci Timone, 433, bis rue Paradis, 13008 Marseille, France.
  • Caillaux V; Centre explore vision Paris, Rueil Malmaison, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, assistance publique hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
  • Bousquet E; OphtalmoPôle de Paris, hôpital Cochin, assistance publique hôpitaux de Paris, université de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Robinet A; Centre ophtalmologique ophtasiam, clinique Pasteur-Lanrose, Brest, France.
  • Massé H; Service d'ophtalmologie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Uzzan J; Clinique Mathilde, Rouen, France.
  • Mrejen S; Centre d'Imagerie et de Laser, Paris, France.
  • Semoun O; Service d'ophtalmologie, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil, université Paris Est Créteil, 40, avenue de Verdun, 94000 Créteil, France; Centre ophtalmologique du Panthéon, Paris, France. Electronic address: oudysemoun@hotmail.com.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 44(7): 937-946, 2021 Sep.
Article in Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147276
ABSTRACT
Choosing a first-line treatment to optimize long-term outcomes is a major challenge for treating patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The development of several new molecules makes it critical to identify the relevant factors to consider so as to provide an optimal risk-benefit ratio when initiating a treatment in naïve patients with neovascular AMD. This paper proposes a consensus established with the Delphi method (which includes a gradation in a consensus based on an analysis of the convergence rate of answers) to provide criteria that guide the ophthalmologist's decision for treatment initiation and follow-up in neovascular AMD patients. Fourteen questions were submitted to 93 French retina experts. Thirteen (93%) of the questions reached a consensus (≥50% of answers consensual). The criteria recommended to take into account were both efficacy and onset of action of the molecules, their safety, and the ability to decrease injection frequency. The primary criterion of expected efficacy of a molecule is a combination of the gain in visual acuity and resorption of retinal fluid. With regard to safety, experts recommend tighter follow-up for molecules currently in development, and at every scheduled visit, patients should be screened to identify early any potential adverse effects such as intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis or vascular occlusion. Experts also emphasize the importance of the packaging of the biological, with a preference toward prefilled syringes. Injection frequency is a key factor, and the authors recommended aiming for a maximal injection interval of 12 to 16 weeks. The stability of that maximum interval is also an important factor to consider in treatment selection.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Angiogenesis Inhibitors / Wet Macular Degeneration Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: Fr Journal: J Fr Ophtalmol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Francia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Angiogenesis Inhibitors / Wet Macular Degeneration Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: Fr Journal: J Fr Ophtalmol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Francia