Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of three two-dimensional echocardiographic methods of assessing left ventricular size in Doberman Pinschers.
Kruckman, L; Fries, R C; Kadotani, S; Stack, J P; Wallace, L G.
Affiliation
  • Kruckman L; Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, 1008 W. Hazelwood Dr, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States.
  • Fries RC; Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, 1008 W. Hazelwood Dr, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States. Electronic address: rfries@illinois.edu.
  • Kadotani S; Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, 1008 W. Hazelwood Dr, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States.
  • Stack JP; Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, 1008 W. Hazelwood Dr, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States.
  • Wallace LG; Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, 1008 W. Hazelwood Dr, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States.
J Vet Cardiol ; 40: 110-118, 2022 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34238699
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Compare three methods of obtaining linear left ventricular dimensions within the same Doberman Pinscher (DP). ANIMALS One hundred and thirty-nine client-owned DP. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Linear left ventricular dimensions were measured using two-dimensional short-axis (Sx-2D), motion-mode short-axis (Sx-MM), and motion-mode long-axis (Lx-MM) methods, then left ventricular volumes were obtained using monoplane Simpson's method of discs (SMOD). A Friedman test with Dunn's multiple comparisons was used to compare differences between methods. Bias and correlation were evaluated via Bland-Altman and Spearman's correlation. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing occult dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) compared to SMOD were determined. Coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated for intra- and inter-observer measurement variability.

RESULTS:

There were significant differences between all linear dimensions in diastole and systole. Short-axis 2D measurements had significant bias compared with Sx-MM (diastole +1.19 mm, systole +1.65 mm) and Lx-MM (diastole +4.36 mm, systole +3.87 mm) as did Sx-MM compared with Lx-MM (diastole +3.17 mm, systole +2.22 mm). All linear dimensions had a moderate positive correlation with SMOD. The sensitivity and specificity of linear measurements to detect DCM were Sx-2D (sensitivity 72.0%, specificity 88.5%), Sx-MM (sensitivity 52.0%, specificity 92.0%), and Lx-MM (sensitivity 37.5%, specificity 99.1%). All methods had acceptably low CV for intra- and inter-observer measurement variability.

CONCLUSIONS:

Results of this study suggest that linear measurements are repeatable and correlate with reference standard; however, there is a significant bias between measurements, and they should not be used interchangeably.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / Dog Diseases Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Vet Cardiol Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / Dog Diseases Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: J Vet Cardiol Journal subject: CARDIOLOGIA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Estados Unidos